English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There is no substantive disagreement between the Democrat Party and this sworn enemy of the US. Both want us out of the Middle East. Both want us to convert to Islam. Both are fans of Naom Chomsky. Both hate successful American corporations. Both hate freedom. Both want to impose government tyranny on people.

Where is there any difference?

Oh, here is one. Bin Laden is more candid about his intent to take out our way of life.

2007-09-07 17:22:50 · 7 answers · asked by buttfor2007 5 in News & Events Current Events

7 answers

Okay people...Bin Laden is not our main target! We are fighting a war with any and all people who are part of the "Islamic Jihad" against us. Bin Laden is just one of them. Dubya is correct in not focusing all his attention and resources on just finding him.

I agree, Bin Laden and the Democrats seem t have very similar opinions about what the U.S. should do. And we want these people running our country???

2007-09-09 03:30:48 · answer #1 · answered by Ukrgrl 2 · 0 0

Come on now, Bin Laden is definitely a Green Party guy. I guess you could say, a Progressive Democrat, too.

2007-09-07 17:37:19 · answer #2 · answered by Susan M 7 · 0 0

I thought it was the Bush family who were great friends of the bin Ladens and helped them fly out of the USA after 9/11 when all other planes were grounded

2007-09-07 18:38:14 · answer #3 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0 1

When 9-11 occurred our great leader GWB made stated he would hunt down and destroy Bin Laden. Great going George instead you invaded Iraq and let Bin Laden go free. How do you explain how he got away? Oh I know it was Bill Clinton's fault.

2007-09-08 02:03:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

And to think that he could be dead by now if Dubya had not turned his back on Bin Laden and sent military to invade Iraq.

2007-09-07 17:42:06 · answer #5 · answered by zes2_zdk 3 · 0 1

all and sundry able of capability will maximum probable do despite the fact that is mandatory to maintain that capability... he has considered what a reliable headed, violent recommendations-set has accomplished.. he lost each and every little thing he had , maximum of his followers, government help, many harmless human beings have died, not something that he had was hoping to end has exceeded off. So needless to say his next decision is to attempt a distinctive recommendations-set "the friendly Bin encumbered" my suspicion is that if the "Paradise interior the afterlife" speech isn't getting sufficient human beings for him then he's gonna substitute his song and attempt and get those that way. you observed what share politicians went from "I back the President in his determination a hundred%" to a minimum of a few thing alongside the strains of "I dont approve of his movements" or maybe "I not at all supported the determination to _____" its all politics.. "If the grass is greener on the otherside of the fence you may wager he's gettin a ladder."

2016-10-18 07:20:17 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

.with one exception: some Democraps are more dangerous they are here inside of USA. enemies within the USA

2007-09-07 18:17:26 · answer #7 · answered by steven25t 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers