2007-09-07 16:56:01 · 15 answers · asked by Lucius Vorenus 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I wouldn't support internment camps. We didn't lock up all Protestants when the Ku Klux Klan was carrying out their acts of terror. And the Salafist Jihadists who attacked us before and may do so again also follow the doctrine of "Takfir". This heresy says it's O.K. in the carrying out of Jihad for Muslim to kill Muslim. Any Muslim will tell you that's a "Ha'aram" (an offense against the Koran).
However, I do support the open-ended detention of all illegal combatants in this war. Despite all of the hollering from the ACLU, it's much more humane than the other option open to us under the Law of Land Warfare (Geneva Conventions). Under that law we could summarily execute all illegal combatants. This way we can squeeze them for valuable intelligence.
2007-09-07 17:05:49 · answer #1 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No not interment camps.....that would not stop Muslim extremist.
Maybe a beefed up surveillance program like probation. Yeah its unfair but tough. If you really love this country and want to be here then I see no reason why not to volunteer to it. Putting them in large groups would only breed resentment and forge a wedge between Muslims and everyone else. I think we have already learned that camps do nothing but cause problems later down the road.
2007-09-07 17:05:49 · answer #2 · answered by Scratchy_Joe 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No it isn't necessary to round up Muslims. If we have another attack people will be willing to rat out anybody that looks suspicious. It's up to law enforcement to determine if someone is a threat
2007-09-07 17:01:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
USA has already set up some Internment camps. Courtesy of Halliburtons brother company KBR. Do you think they did it just for show?
I think they did it this time for the Americans who cause civil unrest against the government, and this Bushes plans for Reagans, and Bush Sr's One World Order.
2007-09-07 17:02:31 · answer #4 · answered by ThatsThinkingWithUR Dipstick 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Now i never normally adress a previous poster like this but wow Bobby D how can you support an act that is against everything America and our Constitution stands for?
2007-09-07 17:12:45 · answer #5 · answered by SS4 Elby 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It sounds like a good idea, BUT as we learned from WW2, it was a huge failure. The truth is, only a minority of people in certain groups would be a threat to our national security. It's best to ferret them out with the tools given to law enforcement through the Patriot Act.
2007-09-07 17:00:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
If internment camps were ever set up in the USA then the terrorists have won.
2007-09-07 16:59:58 · answer #7 · answered by GCB-TO 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
O absolutely not. go watch The Siege or read Farewell to Manzanar.
2007-09-07 16:59:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Of course not. Anyone of any race can be a Muslim. This would mean rounding up anyone that attends a Mosque which is religious persecution versus racial discrimination, which is equally abhorrent..
2007-09-07 16:59:12 · answer #9 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Yes, because it would freak out the so called moderates to rat out their radical kin folk's.
2007-09-07 17:03:26 · answer #10 · answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋