English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The anniversary is approaching and I want to get some answers.
There are just tons of claims out there, what do you guys believe? Please provide a good reason or two, or three along with your answer.
Thanks!

2007-09-07 16:20:07 · 10 answers · asked by DIIV 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

10 answers

1. Building 7 is a UN-disputeable implosion, silverstein pbs confirmed, DEMO takes days to PLAN, PLACE, WIRE, and Comp time link the necessary explosives. WTC7 fell 7 hours after the first plane hit, also was ON FIRE for most of it.... HOW WERE PRECISION EXPLOSIONS PLACED IN ONLY 7 HOURS IN A BURNING BUILDING? THEY HAD TO BE PRE-PLACED. AND since WTC7 DEMO was preset isint it safe to assume WTC1,2 were also?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4260823951534797708

2. ~1510ºC (2750ºF) - melting point of typical structural steel
~825ºC (1517ºF) - maximum temperature of hydrocarbon fires burning in the atmosphere.
I dont disagree that it could have weekened the steel enough for it to buckle and give way. but that does not explain the 9 second "free fall speed" collapse. Those floors were knocked out of the way as they were falling by DMI and 2.3 trillion missing dollars from the pentagons payroll keeps alot of mouths shut.

3. Extreme cencering of statements and HOME VIDEO CLIPS on internet blogs. Google video comments do it all the time. go to this video and look at the comments ... youl laugh hard as you scroll down youl see what im talkin about.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5474006551011489413


4. Who told guiliani about the collapsing towers?????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaBcInYBHgE

5. NIST says the outter wall buckled first from FIRE but if you look closely at this video you can see for yourslef that the raido tower fell first.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=385461126000133930&q=tower+collapse&total=1002&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=2


6. Cheney ordered the media to beef up the war on IRAN.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2007/040907_cheney_orders.htm

2007-09-07 16:34:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Unhappy to feel it however i consider it was a canopy up also, ever on the grounds that the damned thing happened. Unforunatly Bush had to make a move quick so he was instructed by his advisors that they had to find a bad guy and fast. The us had to show the arena that they'll slaughter any individual that may do this kind of horrible thing as the Alquida had executed it right in the face of the wolrd. Bush needed to to find folks but he had to to find any one who used to be the quality guy to prefer on, a guy who used to be hated via most in the middle east, Saddam Hussien he was a excellent goal however now not the man who did the bombing he didnt even help them it was once the dangerous man trees men and women gave him, and the relaxation of us were so blissful when we caught him and killed him, how sad when you think it realy wasnt him a ill extreemist team in the world were laughing their behinds off at us. No person realy knows . Just how the Alquida thinks, they dont care if they die as long as they take the dreaded american citizens with them, when you suppose Iran would'nt use the bomb your as loopy as the iranians are. Bush received us into the worst warfare any one would ever think , becaus we cant win any means or every time sooner or later. Unluckily american citizens are not ever in battle for the longer term, so bet who will must finish it,? Perhaps your excellent grandkids, due to the fact that terrorist are all over the world and even from american born children who hate everything and would handiest be joyful is whole kaose would strike, we have got to tone it down, and begin far and wide once more remember terrorist do not fear dying and all americans need is to be left on my own, and they wont stop untill everyone of them is killed. When actually we dont even recognize any of them, had been handiest informed what we wish to hear. Similar to the Ocklahoma Bombers weren't from the center east the shoe Bomber was english when the lie going to stop?

2016-08-04 15:02:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

Cover up of what? Two planes hit the the Trade Towers. Supposedly one went down in Pennsylvania (but no visible debris was seen on TV..hmmm) and one hit the Pentagon (with no visible plane looking debris....hmmm).
The first two planes...no brainers. Video of those whacked out extremists crashing into the towers is proof. Some idiot said George Lucas doctored the footage. Lucas is good, but he can't doctor live film. Idiots! And yes, the buildings collapsed because of them. (Sorry Rose, no little green men)
The other two planes are up for review. When a plane crashes, it leaves big pieces. At least all the pictures I've seen up to 9/11 were big. It is possible they were shot down and then the scene was made to "look" like a crash. Most Americans would freak if they knew the military shot down a plane load of civilians, even if there was a reason to do it. That footage of the plane hitting the Pentagon doesn't impress me. These dummies learned the basics of flying. They were by no means experts. Do you know the kind of skill it would take to fly a jumbo jet 20' off the ground for over 1/4 mile? Much less getting it that low from 30000' without ripping up the interstate and blowing cars off the road from the wake of the plane going over 300mph? You know how it feels when a big rig passes you at 70? Imagine a jet going 5x that speed.
As far as our government being behind it.....no. I don't believe it. I mean the Dems were mad they lost the election, but I wouldn't think they'd stoop to this level. 9/11 was thought up and carried out by a bunch of Islamic extremists. People who believe that their god tells them to kill people who aren't like them. Early Christianity was the same....all religions for that matter can have their extremist followers. But Al Gore setting it up....nah...he can't even look at a thermometer without getting scared that the ice caps are melting. And Cheney likes Winchester, not Boeing. We didn't do it!

2007-09-07 16:46:23 · answer #3 · answered by unclewill67 4 · 1 0

No, to believe that means you think that hundreds of members of the armed Forces knowingly obeyed orders that caused the deaths of 3000 innocent Americans. Something I as a veteran will not believe.

2007-09-07 16:38:24 · answer #4 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1 1

No ! This is complete propaganda . There was no cover up, by our Government. The reason is the men who committed this act of terror, were all from the Middle East.

2007-09-07 16:55:37 · answer #5 · answered by Norskeyenta 6 · 0 0

Yes!!
How Come Binladens family was able to
escape that day hmm, because of Bush
He knew 9-11 was going to happen.

2007-09-07 18:04:36 · answer #6 · answered by Schnabzzz 2 · 0 1

I'll answer your question with a question.Why was there no FBI investigation?Or considering there were planes involved no NTSB investigation?Were the ANY foresnic anaylsts done on the steel to debunk the theorists?Last thought who was on the only plane allowed to leave American air space on 9/11?

2007-09-07 16:30:33 · answer #7 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 2 2

first of all sept.11th was a horrible act of terrorism.not a cover up.saying it that way infers the act its self was covering up something else.secondly it was an act of cowardice,if you dont like our government attack it,not helpless individuals.they hate us because we support isreal,and we are free.

2007-09-08 08:36:35 · answer #8 · answered by mike hunt 4 · 0 0

We were attacked by Islamic jihadists.

2007-09-07 16:29:45 · answer #9 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 2 1

yes

watch " pentagon strike" on youtube

If it was terrorists there would be no question, so why are there so many questions

2007-09-07 16:57:25 · answer #10 · answered by SPCPerz 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers