English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...To live with one biased opinion of Rupert Murdoch?

Wouldn't it behoove you cons, to actually ban Faux News, and get some WORTHY information that is excluded in your daily news diet?

2007-09-07 15:50:04 · 8 answers · asked by Islam Delenda Est 1 in Politics & Government Politics

Watch the proof, if you are really as patriotic as you say...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743434902428

2007-09-07 15:51:45 · update #1

Sable: Hillary is not a sly cat who will stop at nothing to get what she wants.

Murdoch is covering all the bases, in order to be favored if a Dem actually wins.

Hillary has lost all respect, even if she only had a smidgen to start with, that takes the cake!

2007-09-07 15:57:05 · update #2

"both sides" is meant in sarcasm you brilliant republican.

There are unbiased media sources that cons can watch just to compare with Faux. You will see that Faux is an idiot box news source, that is more like a magazine show.

2007-09-07 16:04:54 · update #3

Parvfan: where and when did I say CNN s honest.

I watch BBC

sometimes C-span

2007-09-07 16:12:57 · update #4

These answers are so sad. You cons really are brainwashed, because bigots are easy targets for the GOP to con into believing their garbage fairy tales.

2007-09-07 16:32:16 · update #5

8 answers

And I suppose CNN,CBS,ABC,NBC, or any other major news network is "fair" or "balanced" ? Nope. Not one. They are all controlled by the same people, and they feed the public what the network's masters want the public to know. They're not there to deliver news, their main purpose is to help you form the opinions that they want you to have.

:-o

2007-09-07 15:58:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Those who watch or read anything by Mr Murdoch fail to be objective. News is like going to the doctor. Get a second opinion.

I am going to enjoy watching the WSJ get watered down to emulate the New York Post.

2007-09-07 15:55:46 · answer #2 · answered by Harry Bastid 3 · 0 1

Rupert Murdoch donated to Hillary's campaign.

2007-09-07 15:54:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

All lies. As soon as I heard Ted the commie from Mass was involved I knew I it was all lies. CNN is honest in your eyes but not in mine. Fox is still the most open and honest TV news. If you're right all the others are even worse than I thought. Peace

2007-09-07 16:08:07 · answer #4 · answered by PARVFAN 7 · 2 0

some day you will wake up and realize there is more than the LIBERAL garbage spewed by your 2 channels...and your "proof" is an OPINION...you need to learn what a FACT is
FOX does show some of BOTH sides

A far cry from the others...whom only show the Bleeding heart TERRORIST SUPPORTING liberal side

2007-09-07 16:16:36 · answer #5 · answered by consrgreat 7 · 0 0

By acknowledging the fact Rupert is 'covering his bases', your invective has been contradicted.

Amazing how so many libs still think FN is a conservative outlet.

2007-09-07 16:02:29 · answer #6 · answered by illiberal Illuminati 3 · 3 0

To be fair - it's Roger Ailes distorted opinion too.

2007-09-07 15:57:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Fox News has liberal guests all the time. If you want BIASED, try Olbermann and MSNBC.

2007-09-07 15:59:05 · answer #8 · answered by SW1 6 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers