Everytime we go to war it is always during a term that a republican president in in office. But this takes the cake! Too many innocent people were murdered on September 11, 2001. Too many innocent people have been murdered since then. And too many people are still being murdered. All for a madman that wants to rule in the name of Allah. Bin Ladin is a coward hiding behind his butchers. Now he shows his face while still hiding. So Sadam was found! Whoopie! Did he brag about The World Trade Center? But he and his sons did suffer poetic justice. Our men and women are not only dying from suicide bombers, but by mandatory Anthrax vaccinations. Worse of all are the innocent children, murdered or orphaned. God must be truly angry with us. Does anyone have any suggestions to send to President Bush?
2007-09-07 15:46:47 · 10 answers · asked by ms 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Google "Physics 911"
2007-09-07 15:52:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am disgusted that Bush STILL tries to link 9/11 to Iraq while our real enemies are at large. The majority of Americans are not as stupid as he thinks we are and polls show this.
Iraq was his war, he wanted it, he took advantage of our fears after 9/11 to pursue this.
Bin Laden should be dead right now. But for personal reasons Saddam was Bush's priority and now we all have to pay the price.
Don't worry, you're not alone, I can't believe this thug and his #2 man were given a free pass after the worst attack on American soil. Everyday that they are at large we are at risk of attack. GOP tough on terrorism? I think not.
2007-09-07 15:55:45 · answer #2 · answered by trumph 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think both sides truly are worried about Bin Laden but Reps tend to think Dems are using him being alive for political debate and put their party in the forefront.. I wish politics wouldn't get in the way of issues like this.. This F'r needs to pay for it, and I'm pretty pizzed about the whole situation..
2007-09-07 15:56:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
So wrong, matter of fact the only other time a Republican was in office at the start of a war was the Civil war. Every other time it was a Democrat, WW1 and 2, Korea, and Vietnam. all Democrats.
2007-09-07 15:54:52 · answer #4 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He strives to be the leader over all Iraq/Terrorism. So..why would he be hiding. He obviously sounds serious in his threatening videos. He's a cowered, hiding behind pedestals.
2007-09-07 16:06:13 · answer #5 · answered by reader 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I am not surprised but I am dismayed that Bill Clinton failed to issue the order when Bin Laden was pin pointed.
2007-09-07 15:54:07 · answer #6 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's cause Bin Laden has Bin Hiden!
Like the coward that he is!
2007-09-07 15:53:19 · answer #7 · answered by MajorTom © 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, lots of us wonder that .... but even more intelligent ones of us wonder why Clinton released him stating that he was not a threat to the US.
2007-09-07 15:52:32 · answer #8 · answered by ValleyR 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm wondering! you'd think he'd be a priority
2007-09-07 15:54:56 · answer #9 · answered by Kate J 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no mystery, he works with the CIA...he's one of "ours"!
2007-09-07 16:12:56 · answer #10 · answered by amazed we've survived this l 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋