How clueless are the liberals to the very big and real threat of Iran?

Question

I've seen many here basically already waving the white flag and sending the message that we're going to capitulate to another Radical Muslim (A.K.A.- Islamofascists) terrorist nation.

What do you think is going to convince that Hitler reincarnate to change his mind?

He's very intent on having nuclear weapons.

Why do you think he declared that Israel should be wiped off the map, or that the Holocaust didn't exist?

This man hates America, Israel, and the West. Many of his speeches have also had anti-American rhetoric, with chants such as "death to America".

Truely liberals, doesn't that frighten you? Or are you peaceniks going to light some more candles, hold hands, and sing "Give Peace A Chance"?

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Answer 1

on a scale from 1 to 10 i would have to say 10. because they are very clueless. why? because they are libs thats why! they don't care about America! all they care about is they're face on T.V. and money. 3/4 of America could blow up right now and every single lib would be on T.V. with a grin on their face saying "look at me! vote for me! i'm so cool! I'll help you! it wasn't Iran's fault, it was the Bush administation! they did it! it's all the republicans fault!" but i say if it were a perfect world a few songs would be in order. i think God bless America is a good one! maybe the Star Spangled Banner too! no wait, i'm sorry, those might offend someone...LOL

Answer 2

This mornings information has lots concerning the French and now, even the German government is "revisiting the problem", as Iran has purely reported that they are going to fireplace rockets into Israel IF the two Iran OR SYRIA is "attacked" !!! i visit submit a question, presently, approximately Syria, and the truckloads of unknown (?WMD?) products Syria won from Saddam purely before that "DASTARDLY united states of america" linked Iraq !!! understanding how "LEFT" the French are, and the "impartial" place of Germany, to me creates a minimum of two new questions. toro gringo

Answer 3

Don't you think that if Bush, this administration, was really concerned about terrorists attacks in the US that they would do more to secure the borders, north and south?

I am human so of course I worry about this country being attacked about outsiders who hate us... But it is a FACT that the hate for the US from the middle east has grown considerably since we invaded Iraq. So my question is are we better off than we were when the war first began? Are we any more secure?

If a war is going to be waged against someone, it needs to be done RIGHT. It needs NOT to be built upon lies. Priorities need to be in place and that priority SHOULD be the safety of the US and its people.

The problem is that what the adminstration is TELLING us and what they are DOING are two different things. You can't expect people to want to support a war that has started off going in one direction and has ended up in another. This administration has done an absolutely HORRIBLE job at executing this war. It's nothing short of idiotic to expect people just to stand by as thousands of troops have been sent to their deaths for what amounts to NOTHING.

We are not any safer than before 9/11, and honestly are probably worse off. They've fed us this LIE about this war is to keep them THERE so we don't fight them HERE... If this is the case, why are they trying to scare us with a bin Laden tape? Huh? Tell me that? As far as I am concerned, we are safe as we are going to get because Bush & Co have a firm hold on Iraq and don't plan on letting it go anytime soon.

Answer 4

No we're not frightened of some tinpot dictator. You're the one crapping in your pants and people like you are the one who make the mistakes and fight the useless wars, not us. Wasn't it your "tough guy" Bush who made the tragic blunder in Iraq?
You think Clinton would have been so stupid? No way.

Iran is no threat to America. That is ludicrous. They'd have to bomb us using FEDEX.

They ARE however, a threat to the region, which we don't happen to own. Nor the world for that matter.

The threat of a nuclear Iran is basically that it may a regional nuclear arms race.

Not a good thing but you know, when America sells nuclear technology to India, who is not a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and then demands that Iran adhere to that same agreement, well then, that's pretty poor diplomacy, isn't it?

You *should* be concerned about Iran, but not as a threat to America. More as a destabilizing force in the Middle East.

And you need to stop wetting your pants over Iran before you end up giving away ALL your rights to fight some absurd bookie man.

Answer 5

You know what frightens me more? The fact that Bush picked the WRONG Middle Eastern country to invade!! Iraq was an easy target, not to mention a "personal mission". Iran was just sitting by waiting for the opportunity to rear its ugly head.

If given a choice of which country to invade, I would have chosen Iran over Iraq - even when Bush sent troops in.

But that is just one LIBERAL's twisted point of view.

Answer 6

Looks like somebody forgot to read the Wall Street Journal today. If he did, he would know that the number one television series in Iran is about Jews during the run-up to the Holocaust, and how Iranian diplomats saved thousands of French Jews from the gas chambers a la Raoul Wallenberg.

Also looks like somebody doesn't know that Rafsanjani has just been elected to the leadership of the highest deliberative body in Iran, the 83-member Assembly of Experts. If he did, he would know that Ahmadinejad is now THIRD in power in Iran, after Rafsanjani and Khameini.

Finally, looks like God Bless America/Anti-Lib is PWNED!

Answer 7

All we are saying is Give Peace A Chance.....sounds better than another pre-emptive strike of doubtful success, doesn't it? Remeber the last time you people said this? I believe it went something like, "We have incontrovertible evidence that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction." And did they? Hmmm......think on that, will you?

Answer 8

Not clueless at all. Its a shame the Bush administration cried wolf. I was actually confused at the begining of this war, as to why we were invading Iraq, when the terrorist threat was widespread and in cells, having no borders or nation.

And no it doesn't frighten me. If me and my young child die then we die. This entire world is at the mercy of bloodthirsty men who will kill us all over "honor", always has been, always will be. But I'm living today and there is no sense in living in fear. I'm confident that a democratic president will handle it better, all the Republicans have ever done is throw gasoline on the fire....or gas money, at least.

Answer 9

About as clueless as they were about the very big and real threat of Iraq.

By the way, where ARE those stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction?

Answer 10

Apparently, you would be terrified of a man with a gun, who literally had thousands of guns pointed back at him