do you believe that anything of which the emotions entails has ethical guilt?

Question

because we could say that reason is higher than emotion and it is impossible for a man who has a direct emotive act which does not commit ethical violation. example when you express an anger it fallows that you must show it yet in way that reason must be maintain but reason does not permit you to anger only if your reason is higher than the way you express your anger(in short a mother will not let her child suffer bruises if her aim is discipline )

Answer 1

Guilt comes after a perceived wrong in self's action. Guilt is the uncertainty for an others reaction to the wrong and its acceptance as a necessary wrong as self has immediate or objective benefit of the wrongs consequence. The other is a loved other but a feared other. But if the act was against a promise to an other but did not have immediate objective benefit but moral or ethical or imperative duty, moral or ethical obligation to an ideal or a fidelity, then that feeling of guilt is in dilemma and the dichotomy comes after the fact. If it came before the fact, then it would be anger.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erick_Erickson#Erikson.27s_theory_of_personality
Stage One Oral-Sensory: from birth to one, trust vs. mistrust, feeding;
Stage Two Muscular-Anal: 1-3 years, autonomy vs. shame, toilet training;
Stage Three Locomotor: 3-6 years, initiative vs. guilt, independence;
Stage Four Latency: 6-12 years, industry vs. inferiority, school;
Stage Five Adolescence: 12-18 years, identity vs. confusion, peer relationships;
Stage Six Young Adulthood: 18-40 years, intimacy vs. isolation, love relationships;
Stage Seven Middle Adulthood: 40-65 years, generativity vs. stagnation, parenting;
Stage Eight Maturity: 65 years until death, integrity vs. despair, acceptance of one's life.

The Erikson life-stage virtues, in the order of the stages in which they may be acquired, are:

hope
will
purpose
competence
fidelity
love (in intimate relationships, work and family)
caring
wisdom