English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-07 14:59:53 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

34 answers

Well, let me see here.....if I were to pick the greater of two evils, I would have to say YES, I hate Bush more. Bush is treasonously stabbing us in the back destroying this country knowingly or unknowingly, where as Bin Laden is stabbing us from the front.

Bin Laded didn't devalue the currency, take our rights away, setup a police state, or leaving our borders wide open for any foreign enemy to walk right in to invade. Bush is 100% aactively working to setup a North American Union and destroy the sovereignty we have left. For Bush, the Constitution is worthless and meaningless. The damage Bush has done will effect many generations to come.

BTW, the FBI was quoted saying that they don't have sufficient evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9-11. He is not even wanted by the FBI.

No evidence = No Federal Indictment
No Federal Indictment = No Crime

The truth is ........there is evidence but it points to the White House, so naturally............there is no evidence.



Shhhh ..."We'll just say he did it anyway!"

2007-09-07 16:44:22 · answer #1 · answered by Mike4Liberty 2 · 1 1

I don't spend my time wasting it on hatred. I think if one is to approach the question you asked it has to be answered in a more level headed way than simply emoting with hatred. Let's face it, What Al Qaeda and Bin Laden orchestrated on 9/11 was horrible, evil and wrong. But how can you justify a policy of bombing innocent people who had nothing to do with 9/11 and making them suffer in Iraq for the evils perpetrated by Bin Laden. He's doing the same thing that Bin Laden did by attacking civilians. You cannot stop evil with evil. You only perpetuate more evil this way.

2007-09-07 15:36:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Probably equally. Both dangerous men who have done Americans harm. Feel bad for the people who don't realize this. (and no this isn't a 9/11 conspiracy theory.)


And G has said it all... Bin Laden was behind the 9/11 attacks but Bush is on TAPE saying he doesn't even think about him... What? WHAT?

STOP BEING BRAIN DEAD PEOPLE!

Oh and let's not CONVENIENTLY forget that when bin Laden was actually surrounded and we could have ACTUALLY gotten him, it wasn't a priority to send OUR military after him.

Bush does nothing about border control, but he's for the safety of this country?

WAKE UP!

dez, Bush is NOT our nation. He simply is not. You can go on believing that if you like, but I DO NOT hate America.

Pythagoras, this war had nothing to do with bin Laden. Don't be a lemming. If this was about bin Laden, more focus would have been focused on him. Do you ever ask yourself why this is? Do you ask yourself why it is that our president said that he doesn't even think about the man? Or do you just turn a blind eye and ignore these FACTS?

2007-09-07 15:07:12 · answer #3 · answered by DeAnna 4 · 3 3

To tell the truth I think Bin Laden is dead. This latest video looks nothing like the first one. We've all been lied to and I have no opinion much of Bin Laden. I do have a very negative impression of Bush. He's the worst president this country has ever had, hands down!

2007-09-07 15:09:48 · answer #4 · answered by Cindy P 4 · 4 2

Bin Laden in a class or lack of all by himself, and is truly a evil man. I do not hate W, but I do hate the way he uses this power to undermine the Constitution and exercises his ego at the expense of our fine young soldiers life's and limbs. Once again, Iraq had nothing to do with 911, there was not one terrorist on the planes from Iraq.

2007-09-07 15:11:53 · answer #5 · answered by jean 7 · 3 0

That's a tough call. Bush has caused a lot more deaths but I suppose if Bin Laden had the entire US Military (and budget) behind him, he could have racked up equal numbers.

But really, Bush was raised in a so-called modern country, went to top notch schools and had every opportunity to become a decent human being. He was raised in a country that used to value tolerance and human life. The same can't be said of Saudi Arabia.

2007-09-07 15:12:54 · answer #6 · answered by Daniel E 4 · 1 3

I would say that I hate Bush more. I can look at Bin Laden and say for sure that he is an enemy. Bin Laden has made his intentions clear. Bush, on the other hand, has sucked off tax dollars and American life in a pointless war. Bin Laden might be scum, but at least he doesn't pretend to be something he's not.

2007-09-07 15:05:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7 4

If you answered "Bush" to this question, you are sick.

I am trying to imagine the American politician I dislike the most (Mrs. Clinton comes to mind at the moment). As much as I dislike her, it doesn't hold a candle to Bin Laden.

I can accept the notion that, generally speaking, people in both parties are doing what they feel are in the best interests of the nation. Sometimes they approach it from different viewpoints. . . sometimes they represent different portions of the nation. . . sometimes they may let their own selfish interests get in the way. . but I do not question their sincerity.

Bush wouldn't be in the Middle East if it wasnt for Bin Laden and Saddam. In his first election, he spoke against the idea of nation building. If Saddam could have abided by his treaty and Bin Laden hadn't had the sick idea of murdering 3,000 office workers, policemen, and firemen, we probably wouldn't be in Iraq right now.

How soon do some of you forget? Bin Laden carried out an action that murdered 3,000 people who were just going about their business. What sort of crime did they commit to justify the horror they went through in their final moments?

If you want to disagree with Bush's policies, go ahead. There's enough material to pick from. But to compare him to a mass murderer? Grow up!!

2007-09-07 15:17:17 · answer #8 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 3 4

We will never find a man as Courageous as President Bush in our time, the problem that has caused so many people to turn against President Bush, is because of the partisan Democrats, the Liberals Media, Reuters for example, spreading lies about him, and the people have fallen for it, and it has caused a bitter divide in our Nation ... Democrats hate President Bush with a white hot hatred, the kind that causes stress on a society to the point of eventual buckling, and collapsing our Nation.

Why the hate Liberals?? When we are at war, we are supposed to be in it together ... Don't you see? The only way we can win is if we are in it together, and that's what God expects of us, is to be together when we are at war ... if we don't ... then how can we expect to win? Victory is acheivable, and we will do it, I have faith in our honorable Commander-in-Chief, and our Awesome Military men and women!!!

OBL? He does'nt have an OUNCE of respect from me!!

2007-09-07 15:31:06 · answer #9 · answered by Jeremiah Johnson 7 7 · 1 3

I can not even believe some of these responses to your question, Bin Laden by a far margin,

Look People Osama is responsible for the followinng soldiers and Americans Dying, WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

93 WTC
96 KHOBAR TOWERS 19 AIRMAN DEAD!!!!!!!!! 300 WOUNDED
98 2 U.S. EMBASSY BOMBING 5,000 WOUNDED
2000 U.S.S. COLE
2001 9-11 3,000 AMERICANS DEAD

GROW UP AND STOP HATING YOUR COUNTRY, IT'S OK TO DISAGREE WITH THE PRESIDENT AND HIS POLICIES BUT ANOTHER TO WISH HIM I'LL WILL OVER A MAN THAT HAS KILLED AND HURT AMERICAN CIVILIANS AND SOLIDERS IN BIN LADEN, GROW UP, AND DO SOME SOUL SEARCHING

2007-09-07 15:14:36 · answer #10 · answered by dez604 5 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers