2007-09-07 14:17:50 · 5 answers · asked by Eric Inri 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I get it... now one can't casually compare Perot or Nader to Paul. Good ammo! Thanks! It was one thing I actually was a little miffed about when people talked about it.
2007-09-07 19:16:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ross Perot never held any kind of political office.
Ralph Nader worked for the Labor Department in the 1960's as an advisor to the Assistant Secretary.
On a personal note, Nader is the only public figure of significance I have ever met in the economy class section of a plane. He sat across the aisle from me on a flight from Washington D.C. to Chicago. He was approachable and had an amazing sense of humor.
Don't know if that's a recommendation for political office or not, but he certainly was exactly who seems to be.
2007-09-07 23:51:45 · answer #2 · answered by blueevent47 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, neither one held a political office. Why should it matter? Both would be more competent than the administration that we have now.
I worked the Nader campaign.
http://www.nader.org/
2007-09-07 21:27:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
ross perot didn't
he's a business man
dunno about nader
2007-09-07 21:21:26 · answer #4 · answered by nataliexoxo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No and they lost badly! What's your point.
2007-09-08 16:46:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋