This is a new one on me. What is it a new conspiricy theory?
I think we had enough of them ever since JFK was killed.
Wasn't a congressman's wife on the cell phone all the way into the building? How can you hide/change that one?
g-day!
2007-09-07 13:43:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kekionga 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
You are a fool. It has long ago been proven that a plane did the damage, most of the plane disintegrated, but there are pictures of some of the survivng parts, like landing gear.
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/pentagon_20020316.html
There are eye-witnesses.
"I was in the left hand lane with my windows closed. I did not hear anything at all until the plane was just right above our cars." [Father Stephen McGraw] estimates that the plane passed about 20 feet over his car, as he waited in the left hand lane of the road, on the side closest to the Pentagon.
"The plane clipped the top of a light pole just before it got to us, injuring a taxi driver, whose taxi was just a few feet away from my car."
"I saw it crash into the building," he said. "My only memories really were that it looked like a plane coming in for a landing. I mean in the sense that it was controlled and sort of straight. That was my impression," he said.
Firefighter Alan Wallace was standing outside his fire station when he looked across the nearby interstate and saw a white airplane with orange and blue trim heading almost straight at him. It slammed into the building just a couple hundred feet from him. "When I felt the fire, I hit the ground," he said.
Since you are so damn knowledgable, where did the plane go if it didn't crash into the Pentagon? How did luggage get into the building wreckage if it wasn't a plane?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/insert.jpg
Where are the hijackers, Khalid al-Midhar, Hani Hanjour, and Nawaf Alhazmi, working at 7-Eleven?
More importantly, where the hell are all the people, the passengers, that were on that plane? None of the techno-farts that say it was not a plane have ever provided an explanation.
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
2007-09-07 14:25:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Fred C 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hmmmm amazing, jet fuel didn't burn hot enough at the Pentagon, but too hot at the WTC. Which is it?
And you do realize "high octane jet fuel" is just glorified diesel, right?
2007-09-07 13:34:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by hardwoodrods 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
As long as it takers to prove that the 190 missing passengers of that plane are either at Gitmo or in a secret mass grave.
- Oh, didn't think about the passengers and flight crew that magically disappeared from the flight?
- Oh, didn't think about the Airline company that would have to make that plane vanish as well?
- Oh yea. Also, the FAA inspects the airline industry's aircraft.
- So the FAA would have to either purge every document related to the missing plane OR the airline company would have to make the plane itself disappear. They only cost about $400 million or so.
==============
So when the wacky CTs can explain all of the above, I will be perfectly willing to listen to their accusations with a sincere ear.
==============
2007-09-07 13:32:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
They did find the 40,000 lbs of jet fuel. It was on the grassy knoll in Dallas.
2007-09-07 13:41:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
People saw the plane hit.
2007-09-07 13:42:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Yo it's Me 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
You will probably never know. They are pretty slow in sneeking the truth out till everyones dead and gone.
2007-09-07 13:34:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It's already been proven - on Comedy Central. Please give up the crazy non-factual conspiracy tales
2007-09-07 13:33:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Constitutional Watchdog 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
at this juncture who knows.
But murder will out
it always does.
2007-09-07 13:35:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by rare2findd 6
·
1⤊
3⤋