English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Well ,,, I'm not a good one to be answering financial Questions because , my taist is done with toung , the sandwitches I see that julie makes have a capital S ,, and I know that was unintentional, but I think that way, so julie will be making my sandwitches , just a touch better,, is all .

2007-09-07 13:14:10 · answer #1 · answered by darkcloud 6 · 0 1

Julie. She can make 9 pizzas which is 4 more than Bob. Where as the difference between sandwiches is only 2.

So that way you will have 9 pizzas and 10 sandwiches or 19 things, the other way would only produce 17.

2007-09-07 13:08:35 · answer #2 · answered by hallock36 3 · 1 0

Better way to ask this question: who should make sandwiches? The answer is Bob, despite the fact that Julie can make more sandwiches. That's because Bob gives up half a pizza per sandwich, whereas Julie gives up 2/3 of a pizza per sandwich - a bigger sacrifice. This leaves Julie making pizzas, which only cost one and two thirds sandwiches each, whereas Bob nees to give up 2 sandwiches.

Suppose the objective is to make the most pizzas, subject to 10 sandwiches being made. Obviously Julie should make only pizzas. Suppose the condition is 12 sandwiches. Bob should still make only sandwiches, and Julie make 2 sandwiches, allowing her to make 7.5 pizzas. No other combination will allow more pizzas to be made. Repeating this process for various constraints on the number of sandwiches allows us to trace an aggregate production possibility frontier for the Bob-Julie team.

2007-09-07 17:04:06 · answer #3 · answered by Econblogger 3 · 0 0

JULIE SHE CAN MAKE MORE PIZZAS.

2007-09-07 13:21:04 · answer #4 · answered by donielle 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers