I've always been a fan of Ohlund's, as he hits, plays solid D, and contributes offensively. Bieska has played a mere 120 games in the N.
2007-09-07 13:17:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Caseman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kevin Bieska
2007-09-09 11:35:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Brutal Defenders 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
they should have let the leafs sign him("ohlund") years ago and built their team from the minors instead of a high priced underachieving "star" that said bieska is a good player who will outgrow the canucks and generate lots of interest as a restricted free agent some team will sign him to a large offer sheet when they have the chance so i guess i think he is the better player
2007-09-08 08:26:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by lambtonliner 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bieska has a lower salary and a longer future. Ohlund has seen his best days.
2007-09-07 19:08:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by PuckDat 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
im gunna disagree with everyone and say Mattyyy Ohlund, Defenetly a solid guy who is a leader, canucks cant throw someone like him away hes to good of a team player.. but if they do decide to get rid of him one day.. im gunna find John Ferguson Jr's number and have a nice little chat with him.. oh and bieska isnt as smart as ohlund, he gets too many PIM but his point count isnt bad.
2007-09-07 20:26:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bieksa without question. I may be a little biased, don't like Ohlund. I think most people would agree Bieksa is more crucial to the success of the Canucks.
2007-09-07 18:37:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Babber420 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kevin Bieksa, definately
2007-09-07 20:27:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Cup Contender 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
bieska is a better fantasy pickup because he has more pm's
2007-09-07 19:09:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by sshueman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bieksa is younger, faster, and more mobile. He's not as smart as Ohlund, but he will gain that in time.
2007-09-07 18:46:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Like I'm Telling You Who I A 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bieksa.
Ohlund looked terribly slow last year and that's fatal in this day and age.
2007-09-08 03:07:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by michael 3
·
0⤊
0⤋