Carrie, Carrie, Carrie.....
the mind is like a parachute,
it really only functions, when its "open".
(republicans....closet gays & cowboy hats ....wtf???)
Anyhoo....
Im a non feminist
proud republican
and I've been told that I epitomise the word "SEX"....
so add me to your stats, Happy.
2007-09-07 11:45:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
i'm an self sufficient, and function voted for (R)'s, (D)'s, and third occasion applicants... I vote for the substance, not the rhetoric, not the emotional pleas of one pushing a occasion line time table. even with the shown fact that, i will probable not be balloting for (D)'s, nor third occasion (commonly takes votes from (R)'s, giving the (D)'s a skewed earnings.), through fact the (D)'s have stepped to a undemanding techniques to the left, and immorally minded and that they are knee jerk reactionaries. it's time to scrub living house, and vote out ALL incumbents, from all facets of the aisle. IF a clean (D) arrives on the scene, who isn't pushing a leftist time table, then i could certainly vote for him/her if their political ideals are greater aligned with my own, and greater advantageous ideal than the (R). i replaced into initially a (D), as are maximum of my kin, even with the shown fact that, as I traveled international huge, as I grew previous pandering to my own thoughts, i found out an undemanding reality... own accountability motivates, and coaching a individual to furnish for themselves helps them to succeed for their existence time... offering for a individual ability they're weakened, and on the whim of the service. I additionally found out that no person has ever been effectively employed by ability of a detrimental individual.
2016-10-18 06:30:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why don't you read the whole article before jumping to a political commentary? As a lifelong Republican, I am so embarrased by people who keep proving we are thoughtless idiots. I wish Republicans didn't stand for non-thinking.
Please learn how to read and interpret survey results before quoting them.
"Among the factors that impact the survey results is that more men identify themselves as Republicans and men are more likely to say they are sexually satisfied and enjoy sex "a great deal." Also, Democrats are more likely to be women; and the poll results show that women are more likely to fake orgasms."
2007-09-07 11:41:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Baccheus 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Why should anybody even care who has a better sex life than they do? If you have a better sex life than I do, that's fine. I don't feel jealous or like I'm missing out on something. Sex is nice but it's not the most important thing in the world.
2007-09-07 13:39:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by RoVale 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
The article (regarding the poll results) states:
"Among the factors that impact the survey results is that more men identify themselves as Republicans, and men are more likely to say that they are sexually satisfied and enjoy sex "a great deal." Also, Democrats are more likely to be women, and the poll results show that women are more likely to fake orgasms."
The "skewing" of the results you mentioned is explained above. I see nothing here about feminists skewing results.
2007-09-07 11:23:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by It's Ms. Fusion if you're Nasty! 7
·
4⤊
4⤋
Actually, after the millions of U.S. taxpayers' dollars that Republicans spent on the sexually juvenile / prudish / repressed Clinton BJ witch hunt hearings, and, considering that Republican Sen. Dole IS the international spokeman for Viagra, I think Republican / Conservatives are actually jealous of liberals who can get it up without a pill and who can enjoy the company of women liberated enough to enjoy oral sex. How long's it been for YOU, Happy? I got a big kick out of that huge story a few years ago about those pretty young girls posing with the President and the Washington Republican ladies were AGHAST at the girls' bare naked toes in their summer sandals. It was a story they felt was important. LOL. Sexual repression as is found in Conservative paradigms leads to many mental and social diseases. For example, the problem with many Republican / Conservatives, like Rep. Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller who died on top of his mistress, Representative Mark Foley, Christian Evangelist Ted Haggerd and Rep. Sen. Craig is they, aside from their adultrous / mistress proclivities, seem to like the boys more than their wives, especially in men's restrooms:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/31/craig.arrest/index.html?eref=rss_topstories
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15536263/
http://www.reformation.org/megan-marshak.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_oet&address=358x814
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ansell/List_of_political_sex_scandals_in_the_United_States
2007-09-07 13:50:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
I think that Republicans being more religious, acknowledge the "soul" dimension of the human person|
Sex would be much more satisfying when it is experienced as a communion of love and a union of souls, than if it were merely considered to be the contact of physical bodies to exchange mere physical pleasures|
---
2007-09-07 11:35:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I wouldn't say that feminists are skewing the results at all. That's the biggest stretch tyou've ever made. That's like saying that potheads have had an effect on the fact that liberals have more unusual dreams than conservatives.
2007-09-07 12:25:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rio Madeira 7
·
1⤊
4⤋
Lets face it, us Republicans DO have good sex lives.
We just keep it private and don't think it is necessary to display our individual desires outside of our own bedrooms.
THAT would be a good practice for all to follow.
Public displays will always upset SOMEONE.
To the feminists: If you DON'T like sex... I feel sorry for you.
2007-09-07 11:17:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Philip H 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Damn. One point to the Republicans.
Or perhaps the Republicans are more satisfied because of all the closeted gay sex they're having? Just a thought.
2007-09-07 11:14:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by ©å®®ĩε 2
·
5⤊
5⤋