Why then does the Mainstream Media show only Thompson, Guilinai and the others in their spotlighted choice when Paul was the clear winner?
You look at their poltical pages and they only show these Neocon favorites and you never see Ron Paul's name even though he has been the clear winner.
Why don't the American people deserve to see every candidate and have a tally of their poll results next to their names.
Prove me wrong.
Show me a debate that he has lost on polls done by Americans
2007-09-07 09:36:11 · 17 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
FOR THOSE LYING NEOCONS THAT SAY RON PAUL HAS PEOPLE PHONING IN MULTIPLE VOTES
HERE IS THE PROOF THEY ARE LYING
http://picasaweb.google.com/J.SkyWave/FoxPoll
GET HELP - DENIAL IS A SICKNESS
RON PAUL 2008
2007-09-07 09:42:30 · update #1
Ron Paul is winning, but the media moguls wish to ignore him. I don't think this is possible anymore. I hope Dr. Ron Paul becomes our next president.
2007-09-07 09:39:23 · answer #1 · answered by Ash'ari Maturidi 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Ron Paul has an extremely small yet dedicated following. His perspectives are no longer possibly republican and that i've got self assurance he's purely working as a republican for social gathering help money. His perspectives do mirror those of the founding fathers extra heavily than any of the different republican applicants. i presumed Tancredo's statements have been extra in keeping with my own ideals, i'm hoping to pay attention extra from him interior the close to destiny. ballot outcomes could be very deceptive, possible evaluate who's polling and why are they polling. documents can continually be interpreted in many techniques. i'm particular Dr. Paul's marketing campaign could use extra volunteers to unfold the notice and getting extra in contact in politics will make the election advise lots extra to you. Even in a loss, you will understand YOU in my opinion did some thing to help your united states by working for persons you already know will make an excellent difference. that's a lot extra significant than purely plastering a sticker on your motor vehicle or ranting on insignificant web content.
2016-10-10 03:47:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul has a very small but dedicated following. His views are not really republican and I believe he is simply running as a republican for party support dollars. His views do mirror those of the founding fathers more closely than any of the other republican candidates.
I thought Tancredo's statements were more in line with my own beliefs, I hope to hear more from him in the near future.
Poll results can be very misleading, one must take into consideration who is polling and why are they polling. Statistics can always be interpreted in many ways.
I'm sure Dr. Paul's campaign could use more volunteers to spread the word and getting more involved in politics will make the election mean much more to you. Even in a loss, you will know YOU personally did something to help your country by working for people you know will make a positive difference. This is far more important than simply plastering a sticker on your car or ranting on insignificant websites.
2007-09-07 09:48:01 · answer #3 · answered by ©2009 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Okay stop with the Ron Paul spam. This crap is getting old fast. The guy is a loser as you will find out in the primaries early next year. Nagging and spamming certainly is not a good way to win friends and influence people to see things your way. Ron Paul is a libertarian, a near anarchist. He is a nut case. The sooner you realize this the better off we all will be. You act as if some straw poll made of the small percentage of the population that actually watched that Q and A called a debate is earthshatteringly important. I'll bet that if most of the country was polled most people wouldn't even know who Ron Paul is. Another group would mistake him for Ru Paul and only a small amount would know who he is and of those a small amout would even favor the guy. He will be lucky to get even close to double digit percentage in the primaries. Face facts, Ron Paul is a L O S E R.
2007-09-07 09:54:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Who cares? The man is an unmitigated idiot and shouldn't be on the stage with the other idiots who are on a level just below Paul. Has anyone really read what Paul has said in the past? He is against everything even himself.
2007-09-07 19:32:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul is the straw poll favorite. Just like Howard Dean was four years ago.
Often, these phenom candidates do very well until people actually start voting.
Winning debates is pointless if you can't win elections.
2007-09-07 09:41:58 · answer #6 · answered by Teekno 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Its to his advantage everytime they marginalize him it proves the media is controlled by something other than the news. Dont you think the poll upset was newsworthy? I think so. The more they supress him the better he does. I dont think hes getting an invite to the next one. Its also to the Repubs disadvantage because people would rather have a waffling liar like Hillary because they think theres a chance we will get out of Iraq. The repubs are firmly entrenched as the war party and thats at odds with the majority of American voters. The American people do not believe that our safety is dependent on the outcome in Iraq.
2007-09-07 09:45:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I heard Ron Paul is responsible for Katrina, 9/11 and crop circles.
2007-09-07 09:42:15 · answer #8 · answered by Peter D 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because by now, you should know the debates don't matter.
The media highlights Thompson, Guilinai and Romey, bacause thats who the polls show have the most support.
2007-09-07 09:57:01 · answer #9 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Vote Ron Paul fro President. I am always wondering the same thing. Shouldn't all those running get equal coverage?
2007-09-07 09:48:12 · answer #10 · answered by oldhag 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋