English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-07 08:14:44 · 24 answers · asked by alsorts 2 in Society & Culture Royalty

24 answers

Yes, Diana's death was an accident. No she did not know it was lots smarter to stay where she was instead of getting in to a car with a drunk driver

2007-09-07 22:48:37 · answer #1 · answered by tankie419 5 · 4 1

Diana was not the brightest bulb in the royal chandelier.
These are the facts of her accident:
Two rich, spoiled jet-setters were too self-absorbed to tell their drunken driver to slow down (as if motorbikes catching up to a Benz would make any difference anyway) and they were both too arrogant or stupid or both to wear seat-belts.

Why don't people who don't want their pictures taken in the back seat of their cars have curtains to close for privacy???? Or black tinted windows. Dodi's papa was very rich and could have afforded such; so could Diana. They were very spoiled and had all the other little things they desired.

2007-09-08 21:32:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

What was it that she knew too much of? The secret formula for Coca Cola?

For it to have been planned there would have been a lot of people in the know who would have known and would have had to be in on the act.

That would have to be a large scale operation. Given the fact that people sell stories on everything from their ex boyfriends to their hangnails, I would have thought that if it were so, which I think is not, that someone or several people would have come forward to try to sell their stories to some poor, low-class paper willing to print the swill that's eagerly eaten up by a public that keeps trying to kindle the embers of a fire that has long since died out. That's one long sentence.

2007-09-07 16:41:04 · answer #3 · answered by rann_georgia 7 · 3 1

Of course it was accidental.All this deliberate nonsense that's been getting said is just a load of stirring-rubbish.They should show some respect for Diana's death instead of turning it into a big palava or something interesting for the media to go deeper into.

2007-09-08 12:10:29 · answer #4 · answered by Maria 3 · 2 2

>>May get some stick for this but i am a conspiracy geek. I think she was pregnant to Dodi<<

You need a calendar. She had known Dodi for less than a month. Closer to three weeks, I think. If she was preggies it was the by the Pakistani cricket player. But even that is a stretch.

This topic has been done to death, just like the subject.

2007-09-07 19:38:38 · answer #5 · answered by brian s 4 · 0 4

I liked Princess Di, but knew too much about what exactly?

Harrods?
Sloane Street?
Smiling for the camera?

It was a stupid accident by a drunk driver trying to impress his VIP passengers, by trying to unnecessarily outrun the paparazzi, and by no one being smart enough to wear a seatbelt.

She died because she wasn't wearing a seatbelt. It's that Simple.

Unless aliens, or gremlins or the CIA or the Secret Service figured out how to use mind control, to ensure she didn't snap her seatbelt on...then there was no conspiracy to off her.

2007-09-07 08:33:16 · answer #6 · answered by allusian_fields 4 · 5 2

Stone the crows ! How much longer is this going to go on ?


What none of you conspiracy freaks won't or can't explain, is How did a so- called killer know that she would not be wearing a seat belt? That would have saved her life. The only survivor was also the only one in the car wearing one. Please explain this !

2007-09-07 13:34:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

My first reaction upon hearing the news was to say "That is no accident. It is an assassination" Given the twists and turns by those who know about these things and the frequent change of Coroner before the hearings I have not seen any reason to change my mind. In addition there seems to be an attempt to discredit her> She had her faults just like the rest of us/What I find slightly amusing is when certain people in past royal service tell the papers that she was manipulative.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!

2007-09-07 08:28:02 · answer #8 · answered by Scouse 7 · 5 5

Diana? Know too much? lol shoot man she didnt know what 2+2 was. She was about as dumb as a rock.

2007-09-07 17:30:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

Diana knew too much. She wasn't killed though. She has the same eating disorder as Elvis and has been taken to the same secret hideout so they can eat/vomit together. They live off the royalties from Elvis' music and his blatantly obvious francise, "Burger King"

2007-09-07 08:23:46 · answer #10 · answered by kernow1977 1 · 5 4

fedest.com, questions and answers