"Garrison began by exposing the contradictions in the Warren Report, which concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald was an unstable pro-Castro Marxist who acted alone in killing President Kennedy. A FAREWELL TO JUSTICE reveals that Oswald was no Marxist and was in fact working with both the FBI and the CIA, as well as with U.S. Customs, and that the attempts to sabotage (Jim) Garrison’s investigation reached the highest levels of the U.S. government."
Before you Answer & comment
see: http://www.joanmellen.net/
2007-09-07 08:12:46 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
also see the video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4315024059102108031&q=jfk
2007-09-07 10:19:15 · update #1
I think the truth has been told many times. The CIA may have had an interest in the assassination of Pres. Kennedy, but I doubt if anyone will ever know with a certainty if the outfit was actually involved as a co-conspirator or collaborator. Several years ago there was a block-buster documentary on the A&E channel that delved into the assissination in depth. And producers of this program uncovered many startling facts about the case. It should have caused a huge outcry all over the country, but no one commented on the program. And I have never understood why. Why didn't the media jump on it with more ferver than anything they have ever covered? After the program aired on the cable network there was only silence. Have we become so jaded and complacent that we no longer demand the whole truth from our time honored institutions? I am afraid so. Evil seems to be winning.
2007-09-12 14:41:20 · answer #1 · answered by Tom 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I for one have always thought that the CIA had something to do with it. If not them then how about the Mafia or maybe even Castro. Oswald DID NOT act alone on this!!!!!!!
2007-09-07 09:29:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
It is possible. Oswald acted alone in the assassination, but there were some interesting relationships in location and people. It is also possible that he acted on his own due to his feelings about the Bay of Pigs fiasco, that enraged him when Kennedy tried to oust Castro. He simply could have been at the right spot at the right time when he learned Kennedy was coming to Dallas and decided to act on his opportunity.
2007-09-07 08:22:24 · answer #3 · answered by booman17 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
well i go by the tape and the tape shows two shots hit from different directions and if you read his policies people did really want those things to occur during that era so I think they did have something to do with it. watch the tape and you will see a lot of seceret service men out of place
2007-09-07 08:37:47 · answer #4 · answered by crushman1 1 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No, No, No. Acording to a posting this morning, it was Kharma. Kennedy has 7 letters in his name; Lincoln has 7 letters in his name. Both were elected in an election with 60 (1860/1960). Kennedy had a secretary named Lincoln. Lincoln had a secretary named Kenedy. See, Kharma.
Weird, Huh?
2007-09-07 08:21:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
Absurd...Oswald did nothing for years but spout Marxist pro-Cuba/pro-communist crap. There's film of him doing it, everyone who knew him said he did it, the Soviets even admitted he was too lame for them to accept as a defector.
2007-09-07 09:53:01 · answer #6 · answered by John L 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
it looks like it was at least two persons, definitely. a cia plot
though seems less sound than mafia revenge as explanation...
2007-09-11 23:46:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nope. Just some crazy jerk who had one talent that he could shoot very far. I'm glad he's dead.
2007-09-07 08:22:09 · answer #8 · answered by Dude2 2 · 0⤊ 5⤋