What do you think of the new Bin Laden tape? Authentic? Fake? What reasons do you have?

Question

personally, I think Bin Laden died years ago from kidney problems and who knows how much "material" we have laying around that can be doctored. Lets just say it is not convincing. When he appears on a HIGH resolution video holding a newspaper, then maybe he is alive and well...... at a CIA safehouse!

Answer 1

It is either a fake or it is old footage

Remember the last video they released

It was proven that it was old footage and the Pentagon had to fess up to that!

Now with the 9/11 anniversary, the Iraq Progress Report and the 2008 elections coming up - this is the time that Bush's savior Osama always comes through.

They have that Leader buddy system going pretty well!

It's almost like they want this corrupt administration to continue - I guess it works in their favor to have Bush and his buddies in power!

Answer 2

It's staged, no video, only a transcript available, Repbot talking points about Dems, photo has different eyes and broader nose. The beard looks like its held on with elastic. They don't even do this well.
Last but not least, there's the timing. The finale of the latest sell-the-war- campaign.
And we let this bizarre administration get away with it again. And the mainstream media goes into echo mode again.

Answer 3

US intelliegence says that the video is actual. officers say that the voice on the video is in actuality Osama bin encumbered. interior the video, he mentions lots approximately contemporary activities. And reducing your beard isn't a sin. in case you have on no account shaved on your existence, i think of i could be lots longer than that's appropriate now.

Answer 4

I just caught a FOX newscast about it, and the DHC (according to Fox) says no increased terror threat !!!!
Is there perhaps a sense of paranoia anywhere, about any tape, by Ben Laden or his associates?
Uncle Wil

Answer 5

Fake, just like the first one. Funny how they turn up just before elections. Just in time to scare everyone into voting for the warmongers

Answer 6

shucks my holy twin brother. he'sin good hands with allstate. the CIA all state that is. heck, me osama bush laden, just flew our family outa country the day after 911.

shoot if we were any smarter than yall dummy repujicans that voted fer me, we'd be dumb.

huh?


ahh neveber minds.

besides i cant eben spells "w"

Answer 7

I keep hearing about it, but I have yet to see it. Where's the link?

Answer 8

Has the tape even been released, yet?

Answer 9

YES! I agree with you. And why aren't more people wondering why an alive and well Bin Laden, who has access to so much money, who has access to so many resources and connections, and who has never been known as a stupid man, wouldn't produce videos that couldn't possibly be questioned? There is NO MORE BIN LADEN. I am convinced that the man is dead.

I wonder if anyone actually pays attention to "Bin Laden videos". Let's consider the November 9, 2001 so-called 9/11 confession of Bin Laden: What do you think the chances are that a taped confession by Bin Laden just happened to be found lying around somewhere in Afghanistan? When have you ever known of Osama Bin Laden to not see that his intended recipients had the chance to hear what he wanted to say? And why would he contradict his previous denial? What's more, the November 9, 2001 tape is of unusually poor quality (unlike previous Bin Laden tapes). Furthermore, his beard color, his health, and his views are inconsistent with those of the real Bin Laden. And there is excessive noise on the video's audio track, which should cause anyone to doubt the authenticity of the tape (that is, anyone who is aware of the location in which the tape was supposedly recorded- a location which lacks urban noise), if for no other reason but that the amount of noise makes it impossible to hear what is being said. I have a good question-- In his so-called confession, why didn't Bin Laden attribute 9/11 to avenging the suffering of Muslims, especially since America was attacking Afghanistan? Surely any rational person would wonder why such a staunch Muslim wouldn't do this?

More info. regarding 9/11 and Bin Laden (since I'm on the subject)-- (I could start at earlier dates and continue further, but I'll leave it at the following for the sake of not being too long-winded...)

No one has been convicted of being part of Al Qaeda- except the dead- because Al Qaeda was basically created by the C.I.A. for Saudi Arabia to bankroll Osama Bin Laden.

On December 4, 1997, representatives of the Taliban were invited to the Texas headquarters of Unocal to negotiate their support for the pipeline. The negotiations allegedly failed because the Taliban wanted too much money.

On July 4, 1999, Bill Clinton signed Executive Order 13129, which froze all Taliban assets in the U.S. and prohibited trade between the Afghan fundamentalist regime and U.S. entities.

In January of 2001, the Bush Administration ordered the FBI and other agencies to "back off" investigations involving the Bin Ladens, including two of Osama Bin Laden's relatives (Abdullah and Omar) who were living next to CIA headquarters in Falls Church, Virginia. There had been other orders, as well, dating back to 1996, that interfered with efforts to investigate the Bin Laden family.

In May 2001, Secretary of State Colin Powell gave $43 million in aid to the Taliban CLAIMING that it was for the purpose of assisting hungry farmers who were starving since their opium crops were destroyed in January of 2001 (ON ORDERS OF THE TALIBAN).

July 4-14, 2001- Osama Bin Laden received treatment for kidney disease at the American hospital in Dubai and met with a CIA official (who returned to CIA headquarters on July 15th). And then, on July 15, 2001, members of the G8 meeting in Italy discussed the Taliban, pipelines, and Osama Bin Laden. According to Ambassador Naiz Naik (Pakistani representative), the U.S. delegation (led by Tom Simmons ) warned of a "military option" if the Taliban did not change position. After the G8 Summit, three American officials (Tom Simmons, Karl Inderfurth ) met with Pakistani and Russian intelligence officers to tell them that the U.S. was planning military strikes against Afghanistan in OCTOBER 2001.

Sept. 1-10, 2001- In an exercise called Operation "Swift Sword", 23,000 British troops head towards Oman. At the same time, two U.S. carrier battle groups arrive in the Gulf of Arabia. Also- at the same time, approximately 17,000 U.S. troops join about 23,000 NATO troops in Egypt for Operation "Bright Star." All of these forces were in place before the first WTC attack on 9/11.

A civil suit was filed in a Washington, D.C., federal court, on September 10, 2001, charging Henry Kissinger with murder. Unaware of Kissinger's history? Read a little about him here-
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?pid=176

Consider how the Secret Service reacted when President Bush was informed by Andrew Card that America was under attack- The Sarasota Herald Tribune publicized Bush's visit to Booker Elementary on September 8, 2001. This gave the 9/11 planners three days to include Bush as a target. The Secret Service did not rush in to remove the President to safety. Why not? That's their only function. But yet they did nothing. Why? No one could have safely assumed that Bush was not a target. If the events that transpired on 9/11 were truly a surprise to the United States government then the Secret Service could NOT have known that there wasn't a hijacked plane heading towards Booker Elementary School.

Osama Bin Laden was immediately blamed for the events of 9/11 even though he had no previous record of doing anything of this magnitude. What's more, he strongly denied having anything to do with the attacks. Why would he deny it if he was responsible? Anyone who is familiar with his history knows that it is completely out of character for him to deny anything for which he is responsible.

The following is Osama Bin Laden's statement of denial, which was published by the BBC- "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States, nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States."
We never heard that on Fox news, did we? Nope. We never heard it from any of our media sources.

Likewise, Osama Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of 9/11 by the FBI. Furthermore, on 9/11, it was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks. This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP leader (Qais abu Leila). However, it's interesting that the DFLP would immediately make a move that's so dangerous to them. Why would they do this? The implication of Palestinians in the events of 9/11 would have handed Zionists a ticket to achieving the long desired goal of turning Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state.

I'll end here. Try to connect the dots... And think long and hard about them.

Answer 10

Considering they are ALL fake...this one is no different kids.