English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They have access to classified government secrets, and their secret lifestyle makes them open to blackmail. It seems to me they are putting the nation at risk.

http://gophypocrites.com/2007/09/hyp07036.html

2007-09-07 04:27:58 · 6 answers · asked by 2 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

6 answers

Y E S ! !

2007-09-07 04:31:11 · answer #1 · answered by Ben 5 · 0 0

Look at the track record. Has there been a scandal in the last 10-20 years where a closeted legislator has been blackmailed?

On the other hand, have there been intelligence analysts in whatever agency who have been tempted with money or sex?

This sort of thing gets found out eventually. From what I see, it's been mostly the mid-level analysts at the CIA, DIA, etc that get tempted, usually by money. They are probably a lot easier to contact and corrupt than the guys at the very top. It seems to me that they also are not under nearly as much scrutiny as someone in the public eye, like a congressman. Finally, they probably have more detailed information that an enemy government would want to know.

I think you're either barking up the wrong tree, or you're using the latest scandal to advance your own favorite agenda.

2007-09-07 04:51:54 · answer #2 · answered by Ralfcoder 7 · 0 0

Yea, we should fire all the anti gay legislators .

Of course that would mean firing the legislators from all 50 States.

Since the Legislators of all 50 States voted to make Gay marriage illegal.

No State Legislature has ever made gay marriage legal.

In the three states that currently allow some sort of gay marriage,

It was the courts, who overturned the laws passed by the State Legislature to ban gay marriage.

Even in the oh so liberal blue states.

Even the Democratic candiates for president, all came out against gay marriage at the Gay Fourm Debate last month.

2007-09-07 04:51:45 · answer #3 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 0 0

i do no longer understand, atheists are constantly asserting there is morals without faith, so consistent with possibility the ban is morally based and not religiously based. in any case, there is an ill to permitting gay marriage, and that's spouses' rights to money. think you have been a stay at residing house mom, husband labored on the plant, and you 2 assume to retire on the business enterprise pension. yet now the pension fund shuts down, because of the fact it replaced into overburdened with the unexpected inflow of comparable intercourse widows, couples, and so on. I easily do no longer merchandise to gay marriage, yet for Goodness sakes, can no longer we get previous the elections? can we ought to have a Republican white residing house and congress lower back, purely so which you human beings can get married? Oy Vey.

2016-10-04 03:46:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Oh yes obviously those silly foot tappers are the worst and need to be taken down

2007-09-07 04:31:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I thought libs loved gays

2007-09-07 04:32:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers