and phone an ambulance and admit that they had been sedating the kids to enable them to sleep whilst the parents went out.
a - the child may have been able to be resusitated and b - they wouldnt have been in this much trouble
2007-09-07 00:48:07 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
It's a good job we're all mind readers so that we know that you're talking about the McCann affair, isn't it !
Now explain how you seem to know so much about it....! ! !
2007-09-07 00:53:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
What you say has crossed my mind - the first mistake was to leave them alone in the room. If they sedated them to make them sleep whilst they were out socialising - if thats true (They are both doctors, they know about medications) something might have gone wrong with that, and that might have been another mistake on their part.
However we must all remember....
Innocent Until Proven Guilty
2007-09-07 08:05:34 · answer #2 · answered by Katrina 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
where is the evidence to suggest they did sedate her???? i'm sure blood samples of the other children would have been checked at the time, and also, how exactly would they have travelled through customs with sedatives and needles on them? think that would be very silly indeed
2007-09-07 07:59:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If they'd admitted it right from the start, they'd have lost out on all the money misguided folks gave to them. Not to mention all the publicity.
2007-09-07 09:36:57 · answer #4 · answered by DavidIrvine 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You were there then were you? have you given the police your eye witness statement?
I am neither pro or anti McCann, the truth will out, and until then why waste head space speculating?
2007-09-07 07:58:04 · answer #5 · answered by madge 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because they were probably afraid that the scandal would have affected their careers and also were probably worried that the twins would have been taken off them. They are arrogant hypocrites who are regulars at church but who would let their beautiful daughter lie dead in a foreign land with no christian burial. Shame on them.
2007-09-07 07:55:48 · answer #6 · answered by trancebabe 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know why people are saying that there's no evidence. There is forensic evidence. The fact that we don't know what that evidence is doesn't make it non existent.
I just hope that all this becomes clear and that Madileine will get the justice that she is owed.
2007-09-07 07:59:43 · answer #7 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I hear what you are saying, but lets put theories to rest until evidence has been found and this has been proven, you will only get slated for submising about things that haven't been confirmed (yet).
2007-09-07 07:52:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because they have nothing to hold their hands up to.
I am sure they know how to resusitate a child, both being doctors and all.
Jeez... stop the rumours already.
2007-09-07 07:52:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
I think that they sedated her insufficiently, that she awoke and injured herself fatally, and that they cleaned the apartment and disposed of the body. There are tons of ways in which an unsupervised 3-year-old can be injured.
2007-09-07 07:55:22 · answer #10 · answered by NMprof 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What is the matter with everyone on this question forum? Nothing has been proved. It's so rude and hurtful to make assumptions about someone.
2007-09-07 07:53:16 · answer #11 · answered by jasmine 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋