kate mccan is a suspect who in the pro mccann group has a red face now hahahaha?

Question

sky news are saying kate to be charged later on today so to those who threw sympathies and money at the mccann what do you think now

all i amtrying to get accross is that the pro mccanns should be feeling pretty silly today as the net has closed in on them and they need to wake up and see the bigger picture and i do think its funny that they thought they would get away with because of their status in society but they are now going to be rightfully charged and justice will be served

Answer 1

l find it very strange that the last two people to see Maddy in the holiday apartment were not considered to be suspects until now.Everybody ,except the most naive,must have thought that they were suspects.But because they started a campaign to raise funds,carried a cuddly toy everywhere,shook the Popes hand a multitude of gullible fools thought that they could not be guilty of anything. How about child abandonment ,no crime.all the pro McCanns will be able to say now is....think about Maddy.....or wait and see.l for one have smelt a RAT from the start,and l am not surprised in the least that the pair are now suspects.What surprised me the most is the time it took to arrive at the obvious.

Answer 2

Innocent until proved guilty.
If this incident had happened in the UK both McCann's would have been suspects immediately.
I shall be truly sad if it does transpire that Kate McCann had something to do directly with the disappearance/death of Madeline (in the sense of an action) as it will show just how low the human race has sunk.
It is worth remembering that Robert Murrat was made a suspect on the 'evidence' of a news paper journalist so I don't think we should give to much credibility to the Portuguese police who are increasingly clutching at straws.
One thing I would like to here from an expert on is how different is the 'blood' from one sibling to another?

How much cross reference within the DNA structure do they need to be sure it is actually from Madeline. Also was there evidence of deliberately trying to clean the blood away. Etc.

Finally how come it has taken the police 3+ months to find this evidence in one of the first places they should have looked?

I remain unconvinced that this is anything other than the police have nothing else to go on so they are pursuing this line in the hope that they will get lucky.

True I don't want to believe Kate McCann did this thing for a lot of reasons, but as I said first up innocent until proved guilty should still apply.

Answer 3

I suggest you read the news AGAIN carefully.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/pressass/20070907/tuk-madeleine-s-mother-fears-charges-6323e80_1.html

And like the local paper, was using this to increase its circulation.

Again the anti-McCann's are jumping on the smallest issue.

Because they have not found Maddie, as she is responsible for the child, she could be charged for her death despite no evidence to point to her being a guilty party in the whole affair which is why she took the arguida stance as a "Formal Suspect" which is the same as the right to remain silent, etc.

Twist it how you like, unless they dig up a body and evidence to point to either of the McCanns, anything that anti-McCanns post in this forum is still speculation and open to Libel and until you have hard evidence to prove that either has had anything to do with the disappearance your argument is paper thin.

Answer 4

Until she is charged I dont think it is anything to get excited about. I am not pro McCann and think that what they did was stupid however all this proves if you actually listen is that there are new questions the family need to answer and in order to do so they must be treated as suspects. I hope that who ever is to blame burns in hell, however it is not up to me to judge

Answer 5

I have not. I do not believe in finding people guilty before a trial. I do not believe in forming opinions without evidence. i do not belong to the "It stands to reason Club"
To date unless i am behind the story no one has been charged.

So I have not and will not have a red face bbecause I have bucked the trend on mob rule

Answer 6

Does the 05 reflect your dob, coz your question is extremely childish.
Suspects are asked: DID YOU
Defendents are accused: YOU DID

exact same sentence with different placement of the two above words makes the difference. At this moment she is a suspect, you people should think very carefully before accusing a mother of killing her child.

Answer 7

i think of they have accomplished the two. They helped by ability of making it undemanding, yet i think of it grew to become too properly-undemanding, in case you get what I propose. All this exposure, exceptionally the attention to the attention, ability that the abductor won't take her outdoors for concern of her being regarded, so she will the two be held interior, or the abductor has had his evil way, and has killed her. all and sundry is calling out for her, that will strengthen the warning of the kidnapper. i think of that they helped by ability of making the widely used public attentive to her, yet they hindered it by ability of exposing it plenty that the kidnapper won't enable her outdoors, so there is way less hazard of her being got here upon. I basically desire and pray that she is got here upon secure and properly.

Answer 8

I don't. She hasn't been charged yet, and if she is charged she hasn't been found guilty. Do not let this however detract from the fact that whoever has taken or harmed a little child should rot in hell.

Answer 9

Suspect? But wasn't someone else
(ex-pat) a suspect and now reckoned innocent. Also, does the old maxim, innocent until proven guilty not mean anything anymore?

Answer 10

What a horrible attitude to have - sounds like you are enjoying this. Maddy is the most important person here.