Said to be photographed a long long time ago.
2007-09-06 23:00:31 · 9 answers · asked by Bryan O 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Zoology
Sorry. Every piece of photographic evidence has either been proven a phony or inconclusive. A dragging of the entire loch with sonar devices a couple years back netted absolutely nothing.
2007-09-07 03:31:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Loch Ness monster is true - at least the myth behind it is.
2007-09-07 09:33:24 · answer #2 · answered by Scozbo 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If it exists it is hiding pretty well. That lake is one of the best explored in the world.
2007-09-07 06:12:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no
but the a couple of weeks ago a farmer found a chupacabra, who knows.
2007-09-07 06:09:19 · answer #4 · answered by scientific_boy3434 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if you have a few belts of single malt scotch anything is possible.
2007-09-07 21:00:47 · answer #5 · answered by Stainless Steel Rat 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's impossible to prove that something doesn't exist, but there isn't any compelling evidence that it does.
2007-09-07 08:22:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i would venture to say no. seriously how many years have they been talking about it? they have the ability to go into the water to look. its not real.
2007-09-10 23:04:56 · answer #7 · answered by KELJO 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
may be
50-50 chances
2007-09-07 06:14:45 · answer #8 · answered by i_am_the_next_best_one 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ya some people say
2007-09-07 06:04:49 · answer #9 · answered by pokemon maniac 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋