Just interested as when Robert Murat was a suspect lots of people I know were rubbing their hands with glee declaring him guilty and now it's the other way round a lot of people are now conveniently saying Kate McCann is innocent til proven guilty when they didn't give Robert Murat the benefit of any doubt.
So if she ends up in the slammer what excuses will you come up with then?
I'll start you off:
a) Miscarriage of justice
b) Witch hunt
c) Jealously as they are doctors.....
Please submit your excuses below:
2007-09-06 22:38:51 · 21 answers · asked by UK girl - England'shire 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
THANKS FOR THE EXCUSES SO FAR.. KEEP THEM COMING!!!!
2007-09-06 22:45:27 · update #1
Be interesting to see how the British Media twist things. With lines like 'Oh, come on for heaven's sake - these are doctors! Not single mothers, or two civvies working in McDonalds!.. They should be allowed to mysteriously do away with as many offspring as they like. After all, we 'all' condoned their 'left them alone in an unlocked apartment, while we ate with friends on holiday' alibi..'
2007-09-06 22:45:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why are people suddenly getting really excited and celebrating the 'possiblity' that these two parents killed their own child??
This is another question in a long line regarding this matter since the recent press release regarding Kate McCann being a suspect...
I dont know the answer to this.. NO ONE IN HERE DOES... So why ask it...?
Its just a f**king awful, hideous, disgusting thing if they were involved and I am not pro-McCann in that I cannot relate to them at all.. But stop celebrating... ITS NOT GOOD NEWS!
2007-09-06 22:54:45 · answer #2 · answered by KB 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He replaced into got here upon not accountable that's a criminal term. Innocence is yet another remember altogether. This replaced right into a classic case of jury nullification. The protection replaced into waiting to skew the info and ingredient the blame everywhere else yet the place it replaced into meant to be: Squarely on the palms of OJ. criminal trials require guilt to be got here upon previous a clever doubt. Civil trials basically require a preponderance of the info. No - he replaced into not being tried two times as civil torts and criminal lawsuits are actually not the comparable. undergo in recommendations the Rodney King verdicts? They have been got here upon not-accountable of state crimes, yet got here upon accountable of federal crimes. 2 distinctive crimes with distinctive consequences. that isn't double jeopardy. once you sign in for the regulation enforcement occupation, you may desire to evaluate which you are the government and in case you act in a fashion which violates civil rights, you may properly be charged federally besides as interior the state courts. Sidenote: Jury's and courts won't be able to come to a determination innocence. they are able to basically come to a determination guilt or not-accountable.
2016-10-18 05:15:12 · answer #3 · answered by broderic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think any of the pro-McCanns (God, I hate these pro and anti labels!) will make excuses for them...well...one or two might, but I think for the most part they will just be very surprised, and very angry and disappointed that they blindly defended the McCanns only to have been made fools of and have their support thrown back in their faces.
2007-09-06 23:41:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
people would not believe it was her because
she is a DR
the problems she had to have children in the first place
all the work they have done,to look for maddie,although that could be a clever cover up.
now that the mum has been made a suspect I am wondering if the parents are not innocent.
2007-09-06 22:49:15 · answer #5 · answered by I dont know 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Innocent until proven guilty...remember that?
That some small minded people have decided to turn this tragedy into some kind of sick soap opera is a matter for them.
Whoever is guilty of this crime will deserve their punishment if they are convicted.
2007-09-06 22:47:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
*Accident
*Cover up
*Report to police
*Husband cover wife
*Media comes in
*Media circus starts
*Couple belives in the story
*Makes money on the net
*Pledges innocence
*New evidence
*Couple gets busted
*Go to jail.
Well, if I am wrong I will look very foolish forever after, but could be??? Why not, happend before..
2007-09-07 07:06:34 · answer #7 · answered by realbeachzafari 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't believe it's taken the police this long to question them. They should have been the first people to be questioned.
I also don't understand why the parents are so 'shocked' and 'amazed'. I'm sure they're not that naive.
2007-09-06 23:38:52 · answer #8 · answered by dadn33 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I think it's a bit weird that this website seems to be populated by people obsessed with this case. There will, eventually, be an outcome of what happened in Portugal. That will not bring that little girl back. Until then, however, why don't you and the others just shut up and show a bit of respect. Or are you planning to move on to the case of Rhys?
2007-09-06 22:46:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
I sincerely hope that the parents are not to blame... but it does worry me that in most of the interviews they seem so calm and together.... If I had lost my daughter like that I would have broken down in almost every interview... ?
2007-09-06 22:45:28 · answer #10 · answered by bigman2ab 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋