Good morning McFans......not long now.
As I recall - when Murat was named a Suspect lots of people asumed he was guilty ....did you defend him? especially as he was an aquaintance of the McCanns freinds. NO!
Why is Kate not guilty if she is now the same status?
Why would she not want to answer certain questions?
Surely she is suppose to be helping with enquiries.
Perhaps you are upset that you backed the wrong horse.
Or you are all Gerri McCann in disguise.
2007-09-06 21:45:50 · 23 answers · asked by -Tatiana- 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
David and Viper ...It is Maddie that suffered NOT the parents ....and incase you have forgotten they are the cause of this .
THEY have created all that has come their way.
2007-09-06 21:55:37 · update #1
Plato this is a debate for adults ...go play.!
2007-09-06 21:58:49 · update #2
Tabbyfur ......NOTHING was found at Murats.
But Blood and DEAD BODY scent WAS found in the McCanns appartment...are you thick?
2007-09-06 22:06:52 · update #3
Dave S welcome.
It is very frustrating . We have all read the same news and statements but the McFanns keep preaching them to us.
When they come up with a good solid reason why it was OK to leave children..not get child care.......and most of all continue holidaying as if nothing happened ..I may listen to them ...until then ..**********
2007-09-06 22:23:02 · update #4
The McFanns are gutless. I really want to post a rant, but Yahoo Answers have blocked my questions from appearing from my work IP address. I can only answer them (strange but true!)
2007-09-06 21:50:39 · answer #1 · answered by dave s 2 · 10⤊ 5⤋
There seems to be quite a few "Lord Longford" types on here, if you recall, he was the one who befriended Myra Hindley, and even though she was an evil child killer, campaigned endlessly for her release from prison. Now I am not saying one way or another whether Kate is guilty of anything other than child neglect at this point, but because we don't know the facts, I find it very creepy that some people on here still insist on giving blind support to the parents! Ok, maybe she will be proved innocent, fair enough, but she is still guilty of child neglect.
2007-09-07 05:29:38 · answer #2 · answered by MissEssex 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She's named a suspect 1 day after results from the DNA lab are received?
It's not looking good for the McCanns.
2007-09-07 04:54:35 · answer #3 · answered by Zen 1 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Good morning to you too!
When Murat was named a Suspect it was clearly specified that it was an investigating tool used by the PJ as done now with Kate.
This was clearly specified, i read it & it was not discussed much here as everyone was way too busy accusing the McCanns, calling him a scapegoad or speculating whether he was in league with the McCanns.
Hold your horses...time will tell & the truth will prevail.
2007-09-07 05:01:16 · answer #4 · answered by Faith 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
They will all pretend they never criticised or reported the people on this board who could see through the McCanns since day 1 and who asked the questions the spineless UK press were too lazy and sycophantic to ask. There is going to be lots of egg on lots of faces very soon...
2007-09-07 04:53:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
viper show me your evidence then that proves that the mccanns are innocent!!!
the only reason all you pro mccanns are getting annoyed is because all that time you was sticking up for them was wasted because i think they will soon be found guilty
i totally agree that kate should get treated exactly the same way that murat was treated
2007-09-07 04:53:34 · answer #6 · answered by [P]riincess [T] 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I didn't back the wrong horse at all.
You are another one who thinks that they are an expert in Portuguese law? Kate McCann will be placed as a suspect as Portuguese law can then divulge more information to her not because they want to charge her with her daughters abduction. Do you honestly think that they would dig up a mans garden/cellar for no reason at all? On just a tip off? No. They have something on Murat and once they place the mother as a suspect they will be able to tell her this.
You should really know all your facts before you start playing with the big boys.
Dave S - Gutless. I'm here and not shying away and I won't change my tune or apologise until the mother has been charged with murder and sent to prison. Until that time. I'm not going anywhere.
And there was me thinking that the T stood for thick but it must be for ****. How ingenious you are to just have one letter for a name. That must of taken some thinking up.
2007-09-07 04:56:48 · answer #7 · answered by Tabbyfur aka patchy puss 5 · 1⤊ 6⤋
I am stunned actually...
Wouldnt call myself a McFan, but thats just something you've written to cause arguements...
I truely am speechless..If they had anything to do with this, other than the slap you in the face obvious leaving her in the first place.. I will completely put my hands up and say Im wrong...
I guess human nature assumes a mother wouldnt harm her child... But having seen the news this week... with the mother of the four year old, who let her drug addict mum who owned a rotweiller babysit.. Im beginning to question whether im wrong.
Lets not celebrate it though... Its not something to be saying I was right over..Is F**king awful.
2007-09-07 04:52:31 · answer #8 · answered by KB 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I defended Murat, I knew deep down that he had nothing to do with it, Kate McCann will now be made a formal suspect.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,70131-1283158,00.html
2007-09-07 04:52:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
I didn't defend him, neither did I accuse him. I was content to wait and see if he was guilty.
I was worried at the time that he was under suspicion just because he was English. The evidence did seem flimsy to me. And guess what? I feel the same way about Kate McCann. We shall wait and see.
2007-09-07 04:53:32 · answer #10 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I used to be a McCfan, a very vigourous McCfan but I will be happy to admit that I was wrong and the people such as Dave S were right.
2007-09-07 04:53:39 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋