Traditionally, quantum calculations were structured in terms of statistical probability, ie. the notion of subatomic processes being indeterministic. Some people such as Einstein and Hooft have proposed or believed in the idea of "hidden variables", ie. the idea that if we believe quantum processes are indeterministic, we must have forgotten to take something into account. They believe that a future theory, or observations, will one day demonstrate determinism.
My questions are
A) What is the latest scientific consensus on this?
B) If most scientists believe in quantum indeterminism (or aren't sure), how are philosophers such as Daniel Dennett (for example, in "Freedom Evolves") arguing against free will? What rational cases are being made for saying that free will is an illusion?
I'm guessing a case can be made, but if quantum indeterminism is still generally accepted, I don't see how such cases could be rooted in empirical evidence.
Please cite sources if possible. Thanks.
2007-09-06
21:14:53
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Physics