English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-06 21:05:56 · 6 answers · asked by paulinatran10 1 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

6 answers

If x > 1, then x-1 > 0

Now let's check the roots of the quadratic expression: -1 and -2

So, the sign is this way: positive in (-oo, -2) and (-1, + oo), 0 if x = -2 or -1 and negative in the rest of R

So, if x > 1 both factors are positive and so is their product.



Ilusion

2007-09-06 21:14:08 · answer #1 · answered by Ilusion 4 · 0 0

since x>1, we let x=2, then

(2-1)(2^2+3(2)+1) > 0
(1)(3+9+1) > 0
(1)(13) > 0
13 > 0
thus, statement is true for x=2 as so for numbers greater than 1..

2007-09-07 04:15:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

(x-1)(x^2+3x+1)
Notice that if x > 1, then x^2 > 1, obviously 3x > 1
Therefore, x^2 + 3x + 1 > 3
And x > 1, then x - 1 > 0
Hence,
(x-1)(x^2+3x+1) > 0

2007-09-07 04:22:51 · answer #3 · answered by Christine P 5 · 0 0

If x > 1 then both (x - 1) and (x² + 3x + 1) are positive and their product must be > 0

QED

Doug

2007-09-07 04:10:12 · answer #4 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 1 0

(x-1)(x^2+3x+1) > 0
x^3 + 3x^2 + x - x^2 - 3x -1 > 0
x^3 +2x^2 -2x -1 > 0
x^3 +2x^2 > 2x + 1
x^2 + 2x > 2 + 1/x

a) For x -> 1+

LHS: lim x-> 1+ (x^2 + 2x) = 3+
RHS: lim x->1+ (2 + 1/x) = 3-

b) For x -> oo
LHS: lim x->oo (x^2 + 2x) -> oo
RHS:lim x->oo( 2 + 1/x) = 2 + lim x->oo(1/x) = 2+

Since LHS is monotonously rising and RHS is monotonously falling, the inequality holds true for x > 1.

2007-09-07 04:26:31 · answer #5 · answered by Thomas B 1 · 0 0

You first.

2007-09-07 04:13:57 · answer #6 · answered by Master of Flan 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers