The Scotch voice or the (affected) accepted pronunciation?
2007-09-06 18:19:42 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Better to have a two voice man!
2007-09-06 18:27:11 · answer #1 · answered by Roohan Selvan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blair was two faced and still is, so how anyone can expect the Arabs to believe him I don't know.
Brown may be two voiced, but he is the master of the stealth tax, and his latest is the HIPS just think that with VAT and Income tax alone he will have made 45% fo the cost as tax.
2007-09-06 18:44:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Scottish voice.
2007-09-07 03:31:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scotch? That's a drink.
I think you mean Scottish.
And it's not a voice...it's an accent. And it's the one I prefer.
2007-09-06 18:30:00 · answer #4 · answered by greenorlagh 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The man oozes insincerity, whatever the Scottish voice!
2007-09-06 19:08:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither, all "four" of their faces need a slap, we need a good captain of industry who can turn this country around like Richard Branson, he would get us back in the black again.
2007-09-07 03:30:46 · answer #6 · answered by just-dave 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer not to have the two faced Cameron and his Boris Buffoons.
2007-09-08 10:52:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Two-faced: must be two-voiced or even more.
Two-voiced: not necessarily two-faced.
2007-09-06 19:31:16 · answer #8 · answered by itsme_jkt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NEITHER. as for her majesty.where has her voice gone, this is suppose to be her country of reign but what does she actually do for us.
2007-09-07 02:23:23 · answer #9 · answered by alsorts 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not ctoss the road to P on either of them if they were on fire
2007-09-06 20:34:00 · answer #10 · answered by Scouse 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋