I loved Ron Paul's answer where he said the entrance of Fredrick the DORK into the race would simply further dilute the NEOCONTARD votes.
The man is a peaceful, Constitutional genius. And for the record, the NEOSCUM will have to physically steal the votes to get one of their cookie-cut puppets in this time. And they will try, but I have a feeling it will get really messy this time, and they're prepared to kill a million or more U.S. Citizens if they have to, in order to convince the foolish that we're in danger from them Al-Qeiada folks. <<< How do you spell that made up name anyway?
I love how Ron Paul just blows the fools away with historical FACT, present FACT and how he draws LOGICAL conclusions that even people who once thought Giuliani was "ok" can understand.
Do you feel as I do? Do you feel Ron Paul is going to walk away with the whole enchilada? Imagine Hitlery and Paul debating? :) What a hoot. A SOCIALIST vs. an American!
But what about Fred getting SPANKED by Paul?
2007-09-06
16:05:58
·
27 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
I have tolerated you traitors for 45 years. I'm moving OUT of the North American Union if Ron Paul does not win. I am making my plans. I do not wish to be a slave. You're welcome to come with me if you have the good sense, otherwise please stay here and enjoy your cashless bondage.
Ron Paul won that poll last night ON TV. How can anyone say he doesn't even show up in the polls? Amazing what you neoturds will do to manipulate REALITY.
2007-09-06
16:27:27 ·
update #1
What I'd really truly, like to know is HOW anyone could think I'm a Democrat? I support Ron Paul meaning that I support FREEDOM, self-reliance, minding my own business, living my own life WITHOUT government interference and most of all, LEAVING THE REST OF THE WORLD ALONE......and let's not forget, ELIMINATING the IRS. Sheesh....does that sound the least bit like a Dumbocrat?...or a neocon-Republican, for that matter? Sorry, but I have a measurable IQ. I'm independent.
2007-09-06
16:31:40 ·
update #2
If Ron Paul doesn't win... Move over, cause I'm coming with you!!! That's no joke. My sister & I talk about moving out of the country all the time (especially if it gets any worse). I refuse to stick around for some N.A.U. crap!!! I'm sure there are a lot more "true" Americans that think the same way we do!!! God bless America!!! We need all the blessings we can get right now!!!
2007-09-06 16:38:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
4⤋
I really liked how Ron Paul slapped down Mike Huckabee and the moderator. Can you believe that moderator actually tried to claim that Ron Paul is taking his marching orders from Osama bin Laden or that Huckabee actually had the gull to spew some fascist crap about "ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer?" Ron Paul tore apart their laughable arguments.
I look forward to seeing Ron Paul tear apart Hlllary "president for 8 years already" Clinton in the general election debates (that is, if Hillary doesn't pull out).
Like the video for Obama early in the campaign said, 2008 won't be like 1984. We are reaching the point where a Ron Paul victory is becoming more and more likely (especially now that even the Neo-Cons newspapers mention that Fraud Thompson is uninspiring at his events). There is no way that Fascist Rudy, John McCain-Feingold, or Flip-Flop Romney get nominated, nor is Fred the answer, so that leaves a void that only a Revolution can fill.
2007-09-06 17:33:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
I trust a fact above, that gold climbed because of the fed 'very own loan bail out'. yet can no longer trust any statements regarding text cloth msg polls being spammed via Paul supporters. To any that watched or did no longer watch the replace between Dr. Paul and Huckabee- pls evaluation the incredibly some YouTube video clips and enable the fact via Huckabee truly sink in. do you pick for a president to stay a incorrect direction? tremendously while the individuals say NO. seem intently at what the Huckster's been doing- no longer something better than any stable vp might do, mouth what the boss says. in case you think that IRAQ replaced right into a conflict approximately oil, why replaced into it referred to as a conflict approximately terror? If we are in a position to pull returned on foreign places spending and foreign places politics do you no longer see that American factors and enginuity will spark a 2d technological era? in spite of if, what's being speculated because of the fact the biggest oil field in the international, Alaska does not pan out our revival will spur the terrific circulate in historic past in direction of renewable, clean power. Have some faith human beings. enable's get our self belief returned- circle the wagons, regroup, liberate the ingenious juices and take our republic returned, to the destiny (because it have been). :-)
2016-10-10 02:47:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Disagrees with what most of the republican party stands for? I hate to tell you this but Ron Paul is the poster child of what it originally stood for. And frankly........ I see alot of Reagan, JFK, T. Roosevelt, A. Lincoln, T. Jefferson, and A. Jackson in Dr. Paul, something this country desperately needs. Whether you agree with me or not doesn't matter. It's what the country needs that does. Somebody who represents the interests of all sides of the spectrum Oh yes and by the way i'm 35 yrs old. He is conservative(i.e. Old fashioned Liberal) by every measure, but i find it intriguing how he also draws alot of attention from the progressives as well. The man has what it takes to be the next president of the United States, and for that i will fully support him on his endeavor. I would highly suggest that the republican party do the same. You'll win if you do. He's a good communicator to boot.
Ron Paul 2008.
2007-09-06 18:34:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I know Ron Paul won't punk out in a debate with Hillary like Rick Lazio did. Deep down, Sean Hannity knows Dr. Paul keeps his pimp hand strong.
2007-09-07 15:20:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Curtis Strangelove III 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, Dr. Paul has been on the record stating he welcomes F. Thompson to the race for the 'diluting' factor which would do nothing but help Dr. Paul get the win.
As to whether I'm ready to pack it up and leave the country? I dunno... but the NAU sure as hell is one huge thing that might make we wanna do something drastic. Just don't know if my response will be fight or flight.
I'm going to step out on a limb here and suggest that Paul supporters should run for OFFICE- not to another country.
We need to work harder at turning things around locally in support of a pres like Paul or in preparation of one like him.
2007-09-07 00:17:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by anyusmoon1 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Wow, what a tirade lol. Well, you better start making those plans because the Republicans will never nominate Ron Paul for President. I know people say never say never, but I'm saying NEVER. They aren't even seriously considering him. The Democrats don't want him and the Republicans don't want to claim him, they actually seem embarrassed by the guy. So is he going to run on his own? If he does, he's still a loser. It will take more than his Internet devotees to pull a national election, and he just can't seem to get above 3% in any national poll. So how is he going to magically become President? Like I said, start packing.
2007-09-06 18:52:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Ron Paul's comment was very smart. I hope what he aims for happens because I really wish living in America under his leadership.
Ron Paul for president.
2007-09-07 03:32:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ash'ari Maturidi 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
If the rest of Ron Paul supporters are as tolerant of others as you are, Mr. Paul is in trouble.
2007-09-06 16:20:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by nosf37 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Unfortunately, Ron Paul is what we Libertarians that don't pretend to be Republicans call a "flasher".
He's more than happy to make a statement that sounds totally insane according to conventional wisdom, and then try to explain why it makes perfect sense, not realizing that the only people listening at that point already grasp the logic. Everyone else is too busy laughing to follow the logic.
He couldn't get elected doing that running as the only name on the ballot if the alternative "none of the above" were available.
And you know what? I get his logic. I just think he presents it about as badly as a person could manage to if they were deliberately trying to shock people.
That's why he's a "flasher". He goes for shock value, which simply doesn't educate or persuade anyone. As much as I agree with him on many, MANY things, he's probably the only Republican on the stage that could lose to Hillary.
2007-09-06 16:16:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by open4one 7
·
3⤊
5⤋