Both of the above are partially correct, and Brian's is the better of the two.
However, on his list, the question isn't whether the case "uses" a federal law, but rather whether the question presented is decided by federal law. That's what lawyers call "federal question" jurisdiction.
And what he calls "cases where the citizens are from two different states..." - the correct terminology would be cases in which the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) are from different states or countries. That's what's known as "diversity" jurisdiction, valid if the amount in controversey is $75,000.01 or more.
The federal courts, under the section Cyanne2ak cited, also have discretion jurisdiction over state law claims that are part of a federal case, and may retain jurisdiction even if the federal question is dismissed.
2007-09-06 15:44:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1
2016-04-27 00:34:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
fdc has trial jurisdiction over all the following:
cases where the united states is a plaintiff
cases where the united states is a defendant
cases using a federal law
cases where the citizens are from two different states and the amount is more than $75,000
2007-09-06 15:02:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by brian 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are in reality 2 kinds of situations that make it to ultimate courtroom a million. maximum in lots of circumstances the case will make it to ultimate if the courts decrease than(US Circuit Courts) are utilising some federal regulation and a couple of courts come to a distinctive end on the comparable concern. as an occasion say third circuit in Pennsylvania says that Civil top Act of 1964 covers homosexuals and then 1st circuit in long island says that it does not. the form of case is very very nearly sure to finally end up interior the final courtroom, so as that they could pass very final interpretation on the federal regulation.[a million] 2. situations in keeping with shape make it to the final courtroom in the event that they're somewhat novel. as an occasion while the concern of Flag Burning got here up and somebody claimed that burning flag is a unfastened SPEECH secure by ability of 1st substitute -- the case went to ultimate courtroom. yet enable's say some state passes anti-flag burning regulation now, the case would be resolves on the Circuit courtroom point and the final is very very nearly sure to refuse to hearken to it, through fact it extremely is not novel.[2]
2016-10-18 04:41:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by reardigan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Maritime Actions.
2. Anything that is a "Federal Question" (subject matter jurisdiction).
I suggest you look at 28 USC 1331-32.
2007-09-06 14:59:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by cyanne2ak 7
·
0⤊
1⤋