http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070906/ap_on_el_pr/candidates_religion_poll
2007-09-06 14:32:09 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Neither she nor Obama are electable. Once all of the Chinese connections are exposed to sunlight they will be hiding under Barney Franks bed...Well Hillary will be under it.
2007-09-06 14:39:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
As a guy who voted for Hillary interior the popular, i could be vulnerable to agree which contain your statements. I disagree with Lucci on her "guy's international" concept. I say; it is the media's international. that's that they who've the ability to contemporary a candidate in a sturdy gentle or; as they did Hillary. each evening I watched Keith Olbermann and Dan Abrams and all i might pay attention is: Oh; Hillary reported this and it is no longer authentic or; " invoice Clinton reported this What do you think of it ability?" evening after evening the mindless ramblings endured till they drove her down interior the minds of African individuals besides as many others. It wasn't purely those 2, all the anchors and networks have been answerable for it. that's the form of situation i might anticipate from Fox, no longer CNN and MSNBC! definite; we can lose returned. Why? because of the fact the DNC does not be attentive to a thank you to hearken to the voice of reason. In 2004 I informed the Kerry marketing campaign he does no longer beat Bush with: "precise conflict incorrect time." i replaced into precise then and that i'm precise now. i wanted Hillary yet while the information media drove her down, like the %. of wolves they're, I reported if Obama selections her for his vp per danger he would be ok. He did no longer! get waiting for president McBush. And Lucci; no count if it remains a guy's international, do no longer blame me. We did our area returned interior the day. i replaced into born in 1958 and replaced right into a huge area of the ladies individuals's lib and a brilliant form of of the different strikes linked with the hippie subculture. besides the reality that i replaced into purely 10 years old in 1968, those issues have been nonetheless very alive and nicely interior the 70's.
2016-10-10 02:36:39 · answer #2 · answered by severyn 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I must have missed something, I don't see Yahoo as having said anything about her being unelectable. I read something about Hillary & Gulliani being the least relegious. How does this disqualify her? Even if this were a disqualifier, why would this make Obama a shoo-in? Better hold off on making bets with anyone! Too darn early to tell!
2007-09-06 14:53:01 · answer #3 · answered by geegee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the poll does not reflect the beliefs of most Democrats, since when did they care about religion or anything dealing with it? Hillary will win the nomination for the Dem presidential candidate and join the likes of Mc Govern, Mondale, Dukakis, Gore and Kerry. The sorriest group of losers to ever run for president.
2007-09-06 14:50:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is the worst candidate in the Dem primary. She is attempting to ride Bill's coat tails into the White House. She will get some of the sexist vote from people who are dying to see the first woman president. They will overlook her phoniness just as Bush supporters overlooked his ineptitude.
I have no qualms against a woman in the White House. I do have qualms against Hilliary Clinton.
2007-09-06 14:37:18 · answer #5 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Wow, one writer for the AP was able to get his story posted to a free news service. It must be true.
It is to early to tell, and if a different writer has a story next week saying she has the Dems nod, would you believe it to?
2007-09-06 14:40:00 · answer #6 · answered by Chris 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a Clinton supporter, but Obama hits close to home... I need to hear more on his Healthcare plan. If he is for universal healthcare he could gain my vote.
I am just afraid for him to become President because I am afraid he won't last long before some white supremisist... or some other thug from the white house takes him out and assasinates him. That's my fear about having him for a Pres. a bit concerned for Clinton as well.
2007-09-06 14:38:35 · answer #7 · answered by Greenie 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ha - this means expect a lot of "photo opportunities" with Hillary going in/coming out of church, meeting with every religious leader she can get in her presence, and her talking about God, Jesus, and her "faith". It should be Hilarious -
Let the pandering begin!!!
2007-09-06 14:39:47 · answer #8 · answered by Michael M 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good! That means republicans will have no problem at all getting into the White house once again.
2007-09-06 14:41:08 · answer #9 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I am defiantly not one of the 7 out of 10 that wants their candidate to be religious!!!!!
I prefer them not to even tell me their religious beliefs!!!
2007-09-06 14:42:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋