just a matter of time
21/12/2012
http://www.endoftime2012.com/
2007-09-06 11:28:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by vorlon 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=599
Today, there are two ongoing developments in the world which carry with them all the necessary ingredients to bring down the western civilization, as we know of it. The first of these developments is the Islamic resurgence, which, many devout Muslims believe will be the final showdown between Islam and the infidels. They firmly believe this cataclysmic clash of civilisation will result in a guaranteed victory for Islam. With great aplomb they will refer to the Qur’anic verses (such as 2:30, 6:165, 7:129, 27:62) which firmly declare that only the Muslims are the rightful inheritors of earth. Allah has assured the victory of Islam by expropriating and usurping the land of the infidels and hand them over to the Muslims (verses 13:41, 21:44, 28:58). The Islamic world is patiently waiting for this ultimate victory of Islam—no infidel should bear any doubt on this mindset of great majority of Islamic diehards.
In contrast to the above mindset in the Islamic world, the infidel world, by and large, is in deep slumber. Note the incredible apathy, ignorance, neglect and sheer carelessness of the infidels’ state of mind. They are in the impression that the current Islamic terrorism will soon be a thing of the past, and the world will, once again, revert to the ‘world order’ which, for several centuries, they have taken for granted. These easy-going, ‘couldn’t care less’, gullible westerners still believe that Islam means peace. Alas, I have bad news for these apathetic western people. To gauge the extent of Islamic incursion into their civilization, please read on.
The Muslim World- Resurgence
Muslims proudly talk about what they call sahwa Islamia or the Islamic recovery that started slowly in the late 1970s and reached an astonishing speed in the 1990s. It first came to prominence after the declaration of jihad in Afghanistan and the success of the Islamic revolution in Iran. This Islamic revitalization proceeded in two ideologically different fronts: with Saudi Arabia being the main driving force behind the resurgence of the Sunni Muslims; while Iran standing firmly behind the Shiite Muslims. These two fronts are independent of each other and had frequently confronted each other. Right now, this is exactly what is happening now in Iraq—one Islam slaughtering another Islam. However, the infidel world must not be deluded by such Islamic Cannibalism. The credo that is common to both groups is their deep hatred for the west in general and America in particular.
Most Muslims consider America to be their main enemy because it is the world’s only super power and seems to stand in Islam’s way. Notwithstanding with such a unremitting hatred reserved exclusively for America, any non-Islamic country has the potential to win the main enemy title depending on the circumstances. Last year, the title was won by Denmark, thanks to the Muhammad’s cartoons.
2007-09-06 17:30:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
In the 60's and again in the 80's we came close.
There are still some sensible people in positions of power that would not allow it to happen. If it did then it would probably be a mistake. The computers taking on a life of their own and making the decision for us.
Everyone knows that there would be no winner and that is the whole point of war, one side has to be the victor and there wouldn't be anyone around to claim the prize.
No one wants to die, especially like that, even volitile countries would never push the button, so to speak.
2007-09-06 11:48:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by pampurredpuss 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
It may well be a matter of time. No one can be certain.
With the rapid industrialisation of the world, a greater strain will be placed on the Earth's resources. We currently spend our time selling meaningless Ipods to each other and trying to look cool - my point being that we aren't exactly trying to secure our future sources of fuel and food logically and rationally. We're just sat here expending massive amounts of fuel doing nothing and feeding ourselves until we're fat.
In the developed world we are massively complacent.
The greatest threat to the stability of the planet will be when an industrialised or partially industrialised nation begins to starve. When China/Russia become economic world forces by sheer weight of numbers, there will be casualties.
If resources are too scarce for the population, you will find war.
2007-09-06 11:46:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. Death may be... -Taxes, for SURE. But Nuclear War; I'd LIKE to think that Mankind isn't THAT stupid...
2007-09-06 12:02:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joseph, II 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing in this world is inevitable except death and taxes
2007-09-09 21:42:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The way this country is being run, it is a strong possibility. Not many countries like the US of A. And that, my friends, is scary!
2007-09-10 08:58:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by nean 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do no longer think of so, it is approximately being waiting to regulate undesirable circumstances interior the international, no rely how undesirable. i think of those weapons are there to guard the international, better than to fireside all of them off and wipe each and every thing out. Why might any united states of america choose to do this, they might harm themselves interior the technique.
2016-10-19 22:50:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
life and soul of a party .lets play thermo-nuclear warfare kids.last one to melt wins.lol
2007-09-10 09:00:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by country bumpkin [sheep nurse] 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah probably, lol, Russia, Korea and Iran vs The USA, Israel..........oh and of course the UK will get involved in it for no reason as usuall lol :P Then the Chinese will take over whats left of the world btw this was a dream i had months ago hhaha
2007-09-06 12:23:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Yes
2007-09-06 11:29:49
·
answer #11
·
answered by Tesco - very little help 3
·
1⤊
2⤋