She's too divisive & corrupt. I don't know how we'd do it.
2007-09-06 10:55:45 · 26 answers · asked by DON'T BURN ME 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nope We are still recovering from Willies great stand against terrorists I didn't know cigars were more important than national security
2007-09-06 11:04:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 6⤋
At least we would have someone in the white house with a clue. Got news for all you simple folk that supported the chimp that is in there now. Get ready for Hillary.
She may not be the best we got, but she doesn't support homosexual pedophiles. Secondly she gets more respect as a woman than bush will ever get. bush isn't even man enough to get capitalized in my reply to your enlightened rhetoric.
How does it feel knowing that the Saudi Arabian that perpetrated 9/11 is making a follow up video. Any one that supports the total failure of a man that cant find a 6 foot 5 man with a towel wrapped around his head on dialysis, doesnt deserve to speak let alone vote.
Too bad we cant keep Mr. Gump from voting ... and using the internet ... Rock hunter is a perfect example ...
2007-09-06 18:50:29 · answer #2 · answered by rikfreese 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A Clinton would probably be better for this country right now than another Republican. Even though there was a major sex scandal with Bill Clinton, he did a lot of good things for this country. Maybe his wife will do the same. She has a lot of good ideas and could possibly be very good for this country right now.
2007-09-06 18:35:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm not sure we're gonna survive the Presidency of another corrupt Bush!
2007-09-06 18:16:23 · answer #4 · answered by amazed we've survived this l 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. If you remember the 1st Clinton years were pretty good. The Bush years not so good. It doesn't matter who the President is the country will survive because the people are so strong willed.
2007-09-06 18:12:15 · answer #5 · answered by mlip16 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think we need to survive another corrupt Bush before we cross the Clinton bridge.
P.S. Don't worry about anyone burning you, you are doing a fine job all by yourself.
2007-09-06 18:08:45 · answer #6 · answered by HP 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Easier than surviving another Bush Presidency.
2007-09-06 18:45:33 · answer #7 · answered by Janet 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. The he clinton was the most corrupt, dishonest, self-serving, incompetent president we ever had. The she clinton would be worse.
These hateful morons who think Bush is corrupt and incompetent are mentally challenged.
2007-09-06 18:39:01 · answer #8 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree with those who want to make sure we survive "president" G.W. Bush first. He's not out yet. If Hillary Clinton becomes president, I think she'd make a good one. Of course, a rabid, lobotomized monkey could do better than G.W.
2007-09-06 18:22:06 · answer #9 · answered by socrates 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, we seemed to have survived (albeit BARELY) the Presidency of another corrupt Bush; - so I guess we could "pull it off". I mean let's face it, for a guy who promised us a "kinder & gentler" America- he hasn't exactly "united" the Country a heck of alot... So let's give the Lady a shot. Maybe what the Office "needs"- is a Woman's touch... :)
2007-09-06 18:07:56 · answer #10 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Divisive and corrupt? Hmmm would be a perfect fit I think. Matches most of this country.
2007-09-06 18:18:18 · answer #11 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋