Nope, It would be an illegal move, because moving to the square that puts the opposing king in check, would mean putting your own king in check to do it. That, in technical terms, is a no no. :)
2007-09-06 10:38:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. Any move white makes that puts the opposing king in check is an illegal move, since your king is automatically in check also.
2007-09-06 17:53:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bigfoot 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. All you can do is place your King so that a move by your opponents King would put it in check if it moved into an adjacent square to your King. Technically, this would be a Stalemate.
orlok
http://www.fatbananafeet.com
2007-09-06 18:22:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Indirectly - if moving your king exposes the opponent's king to check from another of your pieces
2007-09-06 19:18:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by buz 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
You Can use your King if the position is protected by one of your pieces. For example you might have a rook guarding the row that you move your king next to opposing king
2007-09-06 19:59:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tommiecat 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
You can't move your king into a place where it would be in check, i.e. next to another king.
2007-09-06 17:38:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, like Buz said. It's called discovered check--and if you want to see an example, check out the question by gamers71320 "I need help with a chess puzzle.?"
2007-09-07 02:49:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Omar Cayenne 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope. A king can only attack an adjacent square, and it is illegal for one king to move next to another.
2007-09-06 17:36:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by riderpops 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Not directly...the other king would have to be forced into the position.
2007-09-06 23:57:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Aymee L 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
no
A king can not move into check.
2007-09-08 16:24:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋