I was LMFAO watching Hannity while Colms read the winner of the Fox Poll last night.
Then I got another laugh as Paul continued to school Hannity on the finer points of what Republican party is supposed to stand for.
2007-09-06 10:07:09 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Wolf: I would check Fox News or You Tube. I'm sure somebody posted a video of the exchange.
BTW: I voted for Ron Paul 1x. Despite Hannity crying that Paul supporters were voting multiple times.
2007-09-06 10:15:30 · update #1
Poll results:
Ron Paul 33%
Mike Huckabee 16%
Rudy Guiliani 16%
John McCain 15%
2007-09-06 10:16:50 · update #2
Hannity is worse than most of the Bushbot bum-kissers in the "conservative" media because the man simply does not have the capacity for critical thinking. Say what you want about Rush Limbaugh, but listening to him you do get the feeling that he'd probably clear 115 on an IQ test. Hannity, not so much. When Hannity gets flustered on his show, he just starts shouting conservative platitudes at the top of his lungs. Half the time, said platitudes are not even germane to the disscussion at hand. People eat it up though. Makes my head hurt.
2007-09-06 10:19:24 · answer #1 · answered by Easy B Me II 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Who watches Hannity and Colmbs? That show is nothing but a sensationalist jib jab that just drives people nuts. How can anyone put up with the screaming debates? It's like watching a train wreck. I guess if you watch Jerry Springer, it's like a calm oasis.
And I do watch Fox News. Just not the Op Ed crap.
Shepard Smith is very good, as is Brit Hume.
2007-09-06 10:35:21 · answer #2 · answered by Chef 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul was a let down to me as I found his logic outdated. As bad as the other candidates showed up I think Ron Paul proved His time has passed. That will also hold true for Thompson who looked to me like his chances of getting into the nursing home were better than the White House. The baggy eyes and plain old worn out look was even more pronounced than Hillary's appearance of being ridden to hard and given too little to drink.
2007-09-06 10:18:23 · answer #3 · answered by old codger 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
dizneyland fan one million)you're saying he have been given booed, yeah he did no longer have as many seats interior the communicate via fee ticket revenues while in comparison with Guiliani and romney. however the supporters nonetheless got here out louder than the nay-sayers. 2) The text cloth debate shows him triumphing, yeah childrens use text cloth yet maximum all of us does at present greater so than landlines it is how the different polls are carried out. i be attentive to no longer one guy or woman who owns a landline yet no longer one without a cellular. So who're we to have confidence the Cells or the landlines? How with regard to the straw polls which additionally instruct Ron Paul triumphing? Are they innaccurate too? How approximately this Ron Paul wins straw polls (one million) and text cloth polls (2) Others win classic lanline polls (one million) 2 to one million Ron Paul wins, childrens the way forward for u . s . decide for Ron Paul. The text cloth polls and straw polls are greater durable to control because of the fact one text cloth=one million vote and you may't make optimistic your polling members come from a undeniable team of people via finding demographics earlier you poll. text cloth polling is probable the main precise polling accomplished at present tremendously while in comparison with the polls carried out on landlines...who has a landlines anymore???
2016-10-10 02:12:16 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All the Lefties that voted in the poll voted for Ron Paul.
The Cons split their votes between other candidates.
Ron Paul is a bit too out of touch with the reality of the times we are living in to be relevant or to be considered a serious contender.
I DO agree with many points he makes. ESPECIALLY about never going to war without a DECLARATION of war being issued by Congress!
His serious deficiency is in his ability to recognize the correct steps to remedy the realities of TODAY!
Ron Paul doesn't have a chance because the public at large see the flaws that shout out to be recognized every time he speaks.
2007-09-06 10:35:25 · answer #5 · answered by Philip H 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I do not like Hannity and rarely listen to what he says. I do not know who won or lost the debate. Who cares? I like Romney and that's that! As far as Ron Paul is concerned the man is an idiot who has a one track mind. He's an elected official? Woe to America.
2007-09-06 20:16:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Is there a link? Ah just watched it on you tube. Ron Paul keeps winning debates like that then he may just have a chance.
2007-09-06 10:15:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I will laugh more if by chance Ron Paul becomes the President candidate.
Hannity is a crap talker not a journalist and I find more intelligent crap in my toilet.
2007-09-06 10:26:21 · answer #8 · answered by Jose R 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No I missed it. I have looked for the poll results but could not find them. I would love to see the link if anyone has it.
I'm glad he got his chance, I thought they would skip him since they are obviously biased against him.
2007-09-06 10:15:29 · answer #9 · answered by Tater1966 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am laughing at anyone ignorant enough to think that Ron Paul won the debate. Yet again, he embarrasses himself every time he opens his mouth.
John McCain won the debate.
2007-09-06 10:18:13 · answer #10 · answered by Dude 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋