If Hilary was some how elected POTUS, do you think she would of bothered to visit her troops in the Middle East, or would she of found something more important to do??Im glad its all starting to come together for the Honorable Mr.Bush, finally the Bush Bashing Bandwagon is headed for the garage as it gears up to start the Fred Thompson Bashing.Support Our Commander In Chief, or SHUT YOUR PIE HOLE!!
2007-09-06 08:40:34 · 28 answers · asked by LAVADOG 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The question ASKS, if she would of gone as POTUS,not Senator.
2007-09-06 08:52:17 · update #1
SHUT YOUR PIE HOLE KEN!
2007-09-06 08:59:09 · update #2
It's very unlikely..................
2007-09-10 08:22:52 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
particular he has!! basically like he isn't a self-inflicted wounded war hero from Viet Nam. YEA, top!! He could basically deny announcing something. Blame it on somebody else. besides that could desire to easily be reducing himself to communicate to a lowly protection tension guy or gal, except there replaced into some thing in it for him. as a substitute of $$$ Heinz he's married to, he could desire to pass after Hanoi Jane. 2 of a sort!!! Hillary does not help all and sundry yet Hillary---Pelosi is so busy fidgeting together with her new gavel she probable does not undergo in recommendations who he's!!
2016-10-18 03:50:02 · answer #2 · answered by carvajal 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not support Commander in Chief if he is an idiot. And he is. I do not support anything or anybody who does what my heart tells me is wrong. I support humanity, and all that is good. Supporting someone because he leads your tribe and ignoring the fact that he leads the tribe into a disaster is what you suggest?
2007-09-09 21:45:07 · answer #3 · answered by VPOC 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Having been deployed in support of Hurricane relief while Slick Willy was campaigning for his first term, I met the Clinton's. They came to the tent city my unit had set up in south FLA. All smiles when the camera's were going off. Then she proceeded to question EVERYTHING we had done and make "suggestions" as to how we could do more. These people had nothing, but we were picking up used syringes around camp, washing human feces off the shower walls, and picking up trash they were too lazy to walk 6 feet to put in a can. But according to her, we had not done enough. Yeah, she would be there for the photo op, they return to true military hating form.
2007-09-06 21:10:39 · answer #4 · answered by Marine till Death 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes, she would have. She has carefully managed her photo ops in this regard and that is a photo op to her.
Yes, she has "visited the troops" if that's what you want to call it. Big smiles. Lots of photo flashes and then as soon as she's away from the cameras it's back to the business as usual disdain for ALL people in uniform.
Yes, she would keep troops in Iraq if elected. She can't afford not to. She already knows that she must, but she'd make a show of 'reducing the number of soldiers in harm's way.' She's playing her cards both ways on this. To continue to oppose the war if she loses and to keep them there "to fight Al-Qaeda worldwide" if she wins.
2007-09-06 09:11:56 · answer #5 · answered by John T 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
How silly. If she went as a Senator, she would of course go as the President. It's traditional for Presidents to visit the troops of any war and she wouldn't be any different. You sound like a lunatic - SHUT YOUR OWN PIEHOLE.
2007-09-06 09:08:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
She would be visiting HER troops (Pelosi, Sheehan) etc in Hollywood
2007-09-07 08:29:39 · answer #7 · answered by Pengy 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
She would go if only for the propaganda, but you and I both know how much she loves the Military, not. I doubt many troops would care about her being there anyways.
I think we should support our commander in chief, tho we may not always agree with what he does.
Good question.
2007-09-06 09:04:05 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 4⤊ 5⤋
It was charming to see that G. Dumbya could take some time away from his vacationing to visit Iraq for one day. Of course, he was well rested for the long trip since he has vacationed more days than any other president in US history-nearly 25% of his time in office. Oh and those were peace time presidents, Bush is a war president vacationing 25% of the time. I bet the troops wish they could get one day off let alone 1 in 4.
You want to support our troops? Give them the tools to do the job that they were sent to do and get them home. Don't send them into some half assed war cooked up by a draft dodging president and his oil buddies with no plan for them to come home. Don't extend their tours to near breaking point lengths because no one else wants to sign up for your stupid little war. Don't put them in impossible situations without the proper equipment.
And you should shut up until you learn the english language. No wonder you like Bush so much, he is probably the first president that makes you feel intelligent.
Sorry, didn't mean to confuse your little mind with facts. By the way, when I am on the subject, its probably not a good idea to give our enemies 200,000 weapons either. You may want to tell your boy G. Dumbya that for future reference.
2007-09-06 08:53:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 9⤋
Oh P L E A S E - our troops are there fighting for our country, they are risking their lives, who would want to see Hillary, under their stressful conditions?
She is what you send to a Halloween Party, she is so filled with hot air, she is in charge of inflating all the balloons.
But do not disgrace our troops by sending her there - heavens NO!
2007-09-06 08:46:05 · answer #10 · answered by ♥ ♥Be Happi♥ ♥ 6 · 9⤊ 6⤋
As POTUS, she probably would have shipped as many home as possible and visited them here. In the daylight, openly. Thank you very much.
2007-09-06 09:12:10 · answer #11 · answered by Deep Thought 5 · 3⤊ 5⤋