The Anbar region is more peaceful, admits Senator Schumer. But he says the reason is the US military is failing, so the locals are going it alone.
The question, was there going to be a scenario that Senator Schumer thought was successful? I realize if the fighting got worse, he would say it is a failure. But for it to be more peaceful and that is a result of failure, I don't get it. Please explain.
2007-09-06 08:14:44 · 17 answers · asked by KDCCPA 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There is no explanation other than this - for the Dems, everything the President does is wrong. Fighting breaks out, the President has failed. Peace breaks out, the President has failed.
Now of course, the President wasn't mentioned by the Senator, only the military. But the Senator doesn't mind saying bad things about the military. That way he is also taking a shot at the Commander-In-Chief, who is the President he thinks can do no right.
So even if he has to malign our troops to speak ill of the President, well nothing is too low for the Senator. Congrats New York, you have a couple of beauties.
2007-09-06 08:20:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 13⤊ 1⤋
Schumer is an ardent proponent of what has become the unfortunate, but popular tactic among Democrats:
minimize the success of America's military while at the same time aggrandizing--or even fabricating--their missteps.
Remember Murtha's press conference calling those Marines and Navy corpsman "murderers"?
That rat has yet to apologize.
The manner in which the larger Democratic Party operates is despicable.
2007-09-06 08:25:18 · answer #2 · answered by illiberal Illuminati 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
So ... you think of words from politicians working for place of work are rather well worth something? does not you extremely look into their accomplishments? Oh .. sorry .. I forgot ... their information then? ,,, oops returned ... hmmm .... what words did they could desire to furnish returned? To Dr John: ..."Schumer is a neocon sellout"? ... ROFL That Schumer is a liberal is unquestionably ordinary. the american Conservative Union supplies him an entire life score of purely 6%. The national Taxpayers Union has given Schumer an "F" each 3 hundred and sixty 5 days he's been interior the Senate. Schumer's score with the relatives learn Council replaced into 14% final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days. The liberal human beings for Democratic action (ADA) gave him a one hundred% final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, and his lifetime ADA score is ninety 8%.
2016-11-14 08:49:59 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Senator Schumer is a big mouthed idiot. Always has been. I'm surprised he and Senator Clinton haven't proposed strict gun control for Iraq. That would solve the entire problem.
2007-09-06 11:44:46 · answer #4 · answered by John himself 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Schumer is simply a traitor who is bent on the defeat of this country, simply so Democrats can win back the White House. I don't make this accusation lightly, but with his rhetoric, that's all that it really can be.
He called our military incompetant, stupid. He called them failures. Not the politicians failures, the troops. This guy needs to get the heck out of our government, the heck out of the country.
2007-09-06 08:25:09 · answer #5 · answered by Jon M 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Schumer is a piece of garbage. I was listening to what he said on Rush's show today and I almost had a heart attack. There are no cuss words, no insults, nothing that can convey what the Democrats have become in recent years. They make me sick.
2007-09-06 08:35:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Since Schumer is a Democrat who wants to make Bush look bad, he actually WANTS America to fail. It's called "Treason".
2007-09-06 08:19:30 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
There is no scenario out there that the Democrats want to admit which will show a success to this war or our effort to bring democracy to the Middle East.
2007-09-06 08:18:45 · answer #8 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Chucky Schumer wouldn't know the truth if it fell on his head.
AD
2007-09-06 08:28:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is their political spin even if they set up a Republic and everyone was happy he would say it was a failure because it cost to much.
Review logical fallacies.
2007-09-06 08:19:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋