La Mont Jordan, Detroit has no D and Oakland has a top 10 D. La Mont goes for 90 yrds and a TD, Bell goes for 30 yrs and 2 fumbles.
2007-09-06 08:31:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Follow the money 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tatum Bell vs the Raiders
2007-09-06 14:41:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by tfoley5000 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd say Jordan vs. Detroit because Oakland has a better defense then people give them credit for.
2007-09-06 14:50:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Big_Cecil 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bell vs. the Raiders. The Raiders can't stop the run for their lives. Oakland had one of the worst run defenses in the league last year, and they didn't do anyhting to improve it in the offseason.
2007-09-06 15:11:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by DoReidos 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
start jordan. detroit's D is awful. oakland has a good D. on top of that, i dont know if bell is fully healthy yet. i know he was injured during the preseason.
2007-09-06 14:45:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Claymaker- Go Pack! 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Jordan is going against a worse defense
2007-09-06 14:59:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by cubice52 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Tatum Bell...he will be a pretty good choice in that offense.
2007-09-06 14:46:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋