Thank you for calling conservatives hypocrites because one guy may or may not have solicited sex to a male police officer. The fact that you call conservatives hypocrites for it just shows the admiration and respect that you have for the morality of the majority of conservatives.
2007-09-06 07:53:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rich people employ me 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
The hypocritical left applauds the gay Democrat politicians who have affairs with children boys and girls. And the NAG's or the national origination of gals never say a word about Clinton rapping woman and young girls as it is OK for them. Or when the one took a under age boy and had is way with the page was given promotions.
Now Graig might just be innocent as I can say I try not to let my pants hit the floor in any public restroom and some time this means to move your legs apart.
And the left holds no morals and when they attack the right and claim that they claim to be perfect. This is news to me as the only people who claim to be perfect are the Democrats who make no mistakes. And the so called Republicans through their own under the bus to make them self's look good. You need to grow a spin more than the left which they will never as the lost Link they more closely are related to a snail than a human. But you willingly do their dirty work and I am sick of this as you should help your own instead of giving them Rumsfeild, and every other one the left attacks.
WE THE PEOPLE ARE PISSEDDD OFF.
FIGHT THE LEFT AND DEPORT THEM ALL AS THEY ARE THE ENEMY.
2007-09-06 08:00:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
What loose pass ? Republicans demanded that larry craig surrender from congress at present after the allegations got here out. that would not sound like a loose pass to me. additionally, Clinton committed a criminal, by committing perjury. Larry Craigs crime replaced right into a misdemeanor it is not as much as maximum people celebration in congress, to return to a decision what to do approximately larry craig and despite if he could be censored by the Senate.
2016-12-31 14:33:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not in public anyway, he would likely have had the typical conservative reaction of public condemnation and mock outrage. Once a hypocrite, always a hypocrite, it seems endemic to those who proclaim their outrage and judgment the loudest.
2007-09-06 09:29:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by HP 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Would he have been OK?
He would have asked Clinton for the intern's phone number and then would have met him in the Capitol's bathroom!!!
GOP = Good Old (homo)Phobes
2007-09-06 10:12:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by NAPOLI 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is interesting to me that the repubs are still blabbing about being for "family values" all the while Craig and Foley, VIter and Stevens and Young chasing after little boys. So the repubs are all for having homosexual sex with minor children, but against gay/lesbian marriages? Just like Bush, do as I say, not as I do . . . . I will tell you how to conduct your life but you certainly can't criticize mine.
2007-09-06 07:47:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by commonsense 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
he is getting his just deserts at present for being immoral himself and then trying to be all moral over someone else that stumbled if i recall he screamed the loudest over clinton and now we see how hypocritcal he truly was all along and there are a lot more coming out of the woodwork in his party it seems
2007-09-06 07:38:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by billc4u 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
As of late I guess he would have been ok with it. lol As sneaky as Clinton was though I can't see him with a man. That wasn't his bag. He loved BJ's more than anything from a woman, any woman. lol
2007-09-06 07:51:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Irish 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Craig is anything like Newt Gingrich and many other GOPs in Congress apparently not.
2007-09-06 07:39:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by wyldfyr 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Craig would've railed publicly against Clinton's immorality while continuing to get it on with his own boytoy.
2007-09-06 07:42:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
3⤊
2⤋