Would you vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger or Hillary Clinton for President?

Answer 1

If you mean of the United States, only Hillary could be voted for. Arnold doesn't qualify, as he was born outside the united states. However, I don't think that is the spirit of the question.

Arnold is social liberal and fiscally conservative. This means that, in general, he likes to help people as much as possible while spending the least amount of money. In addition, he also believes that money spent by the government should help everyone financially, rather than just a few people. An example of this is wind energy. It has a high initial cost, but saves money in terms of environmental cleanup costs.

Hillary, on the other hand, is socially and fiscally liberal. She thinks the government should help people and to help people is willing to spend more money that there is financial benefit because she thinks that the government is also responsible for providing a higher quality of life.

In addition, Hillary is a girl. While this doesn't change her ability to be in charge in America, many countries (like those in the middle east) are lead by people who don't think women should lead a country. This could effect our foreign relations with these countries. There are other countries, mostly European, who think gender equality is a good thing and will like America more if we elect a woman president. The question is if the benefits electing a female president has on gender equality is worth the risk for upsetting our relationship with more conservative countries.

Personally, I think that either would make a fabulous president. However I would vote for Arnold if he could run. I really like what he has been doing in California and think that he could help the country go in the direction it needs to go without being economically destructive.

An aside, in the last presidential election, I voted for Kerry (D).

Answer 2

Hillary Clinton

Answer 3

I am not a citizen of USA and cannot vote.

I learn that unlike India nobody who is not a born American cannot go to the White House. In India Sonia Gandhi would be the next Prime Miniser even if she is of Italian origin.We have a tradition that once some Indian has accepted a bride she becomes an Indian irrespectiive of her origin and is entitled to all rights an Indian enjoys(The controversy generated last time against her was just Party politics.)So I have a doubt whether Albert can fight the presidential election.Consequently the only choice that remains is Hillary.As an Indian I would vote for her if I was an American. The way she stood solidly behind Bill during the controversy he went through was so Indian in character

Answer 4

For some reason I do not want Bill Clinton as first gentleman. I seem to remember him teaching the children of the world about deceit and oral sex. His appointed Surgeon General stood in front of the nation and told children to try oral sex it was safer than 'real' sex. I also remember that Hillary just swallowed her pride for position when she knew that he had cheated on her for years with way more than one woman. I also remember the empty promises of Hillary about her reform of the health care system. I had to ask my grandson about oral sex--he said, oh it's not considered sex anymore. Well I say no to Hillary and no to Bill as first Gentleman. Even if Arnold can't run he is much cleaner than Bill and Hillary. He never had the opportunity to take the silverware out of the White House or build a fancy home in New York to establish residency and build a place for secret service to live and charge back our Government to the tune of the payments on the new mansion. Nope on both--I would like to see a straight clean candidate, no matter what the party.

Answer 5

Hillary

Answer 6

Schwarzenegger

Answer 7

I cant' take Schwarzenegger seriously ..for some odd reason. Hillary she seems like she can kick some butts ..so I pick Hillary. But I can't vote I'm not American..it will be interesting.

Answer 8

Arnold couldn't run for president; he's not a natural-born citizen. No, I wouldn't vote for Hillary. She's got way too much baggage, and one piece of baggage wants to be on the Supreme Court. She also wants to groom her daughter to get in the "family business."

Nope, Nope, Nope.

Edit: To Goldwing -- If Social Security wasn't repaid, there was NO budget surplus. And Social Security wasn't repaid. We agree to disagree on this potential candidate.

Answer 9

Arnold

Answer 10

Neither. It's the same dilemma I had during the last presidential election. I didn't appreciate either of the candidates. I won't vote for the lesser of 2 evils. I only vote for people I believe can do the job.