Ok, the queen is rich, but not filthy rich, so why are people making it out as if she is sooo extraordinarily rich when in reality she is not. She isn't even the richest woman in britain and doesn't even make it in the top ten richest royals in the world.
Most of the assets she has don't belong to her. Buckingham palace, the crown jewels and some of the various castles aren't even hers, they belong to the state. If you take a look at the world billionaires or the worlds richest people, she is waaay down the list. She may be royal, but its not the same as being filthy rich so why do people make it out as if she is so rich.
2007-09-06
05:05:12
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Judge
3
in
Society & Culture
➔ Royalty
Bob W, if you can get off yahoo and do some research, you would know that even JK Rowling is much richer than the queen. And it's a known fact that buckingham palace, the crown jewels..etc belong to the state. If you read the question properly, you would understand that i said she is rich but NOT extraordinarily rich. Maybe you need to do some research before giving such a broad answer to my question!
2007-09-06
05:32:22 ·
update #1