English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How would it effect them?
Open your minds,please.

2007-09-06 04:35:02 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Zoology

4 answers

Basic skeletal design is genetically determined and since modern evolutionary theory states that acquired traits are not inherited, the loss of bone mass experienced by an individual exposed to low gravity would not be transmitted to its offspring. However, if it is beneficial for animals to have the lowest possible bone mass, then evolution in reduced gravity should favor those species with a genetic tendency toward lightweight skeletons: animals with low bone mass would have a competitive edge over animals equipped with more massive skeletons. Additionally, because such animals would devote relatively less body mass to the skeleton, they should be able to grow much larger than animals with heavier skeletons and there should be an increase in the size of the very largest land animals. Because of its magnified effect on large animals, a 20% reduction in gravity would, in effect, foster the evolution of giants – animals with the skeleton of an elephant but the mass of a whale.

2007-09-06 05:07:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I suppose it's possible, but it would have to influence some kind of selective pressure on the animals in question.

2007-09-06 04:43:02 · answer #2 · answered by John R 7 · 0 0

It would provided that the gravitational change created some kind of selective pressure.

2007-09-06 04:51:22 · answer #3 · answered by Lee S 6 · 0 0

Any change to the environment affects a species. So, yes.

2007-09-06 06:00:17 · answer #4 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers