English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

New world order is a term used by the former president Bush along with "a thousand points of light"
Does any body have a clue as to what he was talking about?

2007-09-06 02:55:55 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference Words & Wordplay

9 answers

Some would say "New World Order" is a cryptic phrase that reflects the secret goals and machinations of the Illuminati, a group of powerful bankers, politicians and industrialists that conspire to rule the world.

Defenders of the phrase might point out that the "New World Order" that appears on America's dollar bills ( "Novus Ordo Seclorum" is a further reflection of this dastardly conspiracy.

"Novus Ordo Seclorum" was the motto suggested in 1782 by Charles Thomson, the Founding Father chosen by the Continental Congress to come up with the final design for the Great Seal of the United States. It was supposedly suggestive of the "New Age Of America" Meaning; democracy, enlightenment, prosperity, peace...

Well, we have had some prosperity at least.

The thousand points of light" was simply a metaphor written by one of Bush's speech writers in the attempt to sell his retarded school reforms, including the infamous "No Child Left Behind" slogan / policy; which is an abysmal failure.

You can make up your own mind about the validity of these conspiracy theories. If you would like a very interesting and well-produced film to watch, search for "Zeitgeist."

It has information about the meaning of "ages" and other arcane western symbolism. It also has some pertinent information about the New World Order.

Peace.

2007-09-06 03:10:55 · answer #1 · answered by Aleph Null 5 · 1 1

Contrary to all the nutty conspiracy theories connected to this term, Bush was trying to outline an idea of how, as international relations were (necessarily) changing after the fall of the Soviet Union, we might be able to bring about a period of more co-operation among nations.

Bush used the expression-- and outlined what HE meant by it-- in his "Toward a New World Order" speech of Sept 11, 1990, in the time leading up to the first Gulf War. (The specific matter for co-operation at that time concerned controlling tyrants like Saddam Hussein, who had just invaded Kuwait.) Here is the key part of the speech:

"Clearly, no longer can a dictator count on East-West confrontation to stymie concerted United Nations action against aggression.

"A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge: A new era—freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony.

"A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor, and today that new world is struggling to be born. A world quite different from the one we've known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak.

"This is the vision that I shared with President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and the other leaders from Europe, the gulf and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come."

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Toward_a_New_World_Order

2007-09-06 05:37:16 · answer #2 · answered by bruhaha 7 · 0 2

If God didn't love the world (all it's inhabitants) then none of us would be saved, because even though He knew who would accept Him, none of us were Christians at the time He spoke this. 2 Corinthians 5:15New King James Version (NKJV) 15 and He died for all, that those who live should live no longer for themselves, but for Him who died for them and rose again. To say the Jesus died for certain people is pretty arrogant. Everyone in this world needs a Savior and He offered Himself for all.

2016-05-22 13:28:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It is simply (and not very well though out) political rhetoric.

In Latin it would be "Novus Ordo Mundi"

New order of the Earth.

2007-09-06 03:38:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

World centralized government by one entity which benefits a wealthy hierarchy and that is unipolar in that it has a monoply on politics, banking, military, police and capital.

2007-09-06 03:00:08 · answer #5 · answered by Trevor S 4 · 3 1

The same as "a chicken in every pot". Vote for me and everything will come up roses. Sure!

2007-09-06 03:36:18 · answer #6 · answered by picador 7 · 0 1

satanic control over the system and world

2015-10-28 03:05:06 · answer #7 · answered by rafael 1 · 0 0

Aren't they a bunch of wrestling geeks.

2007-09-06 02:58:55 · answer #8 · answered by civil_seismic_eng 4 · 0 1

a big CHANGE in our society

2007-09-06 02:59:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers