The liberals are very short on solutions..........
2007-09-06 02:19:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brian 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
Once again someone wants to blame the non-existant 'liberals' for some terrible plot, or utterance or belief. Accusing a non-existant entity of not revealing a 'plan' is at least original. A better question would be, 'What does the Bush Junta want to do? Do they have a 'plan'? Considering that the Republican reactionaries have had a lock on the GOP since 2000 and plan to continue into the future as the 'permanent majority' you would think that they, and only they would have the answer to all things. Evidently they don't or we would have heard about it by now. Realistically there really isn't much that can be done except 'containment' or worst case military action. As the Bush Junta has pretty much chewed through our military establishment fighting the BushWar for Oil in Iraq that leaves us few options militarly except to 'bomb the hell out of them'. Is anyone up for that? So far nobody has gotten out in front of that option. Do something, or do nothing? Asking the 'strawman liberals' what to do isn't helping....why not ask the people in charge? D'oh!
2007-09-06 09:36:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Noah H 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
The liberals are led by Nancy Pelosi.
Her solution is to dress up like a gucci bag lady and go visit.
She is in favor of TALKING like a European to them.
We saw what European Talking did in Bosnia. They yapped and yapped while a genocide was going on.
We had to go half way around the world to do their wet work for them. (BTW the liberals are constantly pointing out that Iraq never attacked us. Did Bosnia attack us? Did they have WMD?)
I digress.
Iran has no refineries to make fuel, only petro chemicals. They import fuel while exporting crude.
You can expect Pelosi to offer Iran a few zillion gallons of refined diesel as a bribe to make nice ala North Korea.
They'll use the diesel to run the generators that power their centrifuges to make enriched uranium. The French will build them a heavy water reactor power plant and next time Pelosi will have to come up with something other than fuel. They won't need it.
2007-09-06 09:30:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If diplomacy doesn't work, leave them to their own devices... They may have the raw materials and the means to build it, but they are grossly lacking in know-how. Any bomb they create is more likely to devastate Tehran than New York.
(Just like North Korea's 6 "long distance" Taepodong missiles that crumbled on the launch pad upon ignition.)
A good analogy is letting a kid play with fire: they always burn themselves, and/or their immediate surroundings. Not necessarily the whole building.
2007-09-06 09:28:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by tiny Valkyrie 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
By allowing Saddam Hussein to keep them in check. Oh, he's gone now. Now that Bush has destroyed Iran's arch enemy for them, Iran has breathing room to do as they please. Thanks to Bush, the US military has to be Iraq's police force AND deal with Iraq's enemies. Meanwhile, a large portion of Iraq is now under the influence of Iran. Thank you Mr. Bush.
How about letting Israel deal with Iran for a change. Why is the US military being farmed out to other nations? Neo-cons shun the UN control of US foreign policy yet welcome Middle East control of US foreign policy.
2007-09-06 09:31:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
I propose to have been engaged in dialogue and negotiations with them for the past seven years instead of name-calling ("axis of evil" indeed. Now THAT was a warm prelude to compromise.....) and refusing to talk to them like a pouting six-year-old.
It's so amusing to me that it's starting to be a broken record with the Republican party. Now that the eight-year Reign of Terror is coming to an end, all of you guys are starting to run around screaming about the DEMOCRATS coming up with solutions to PROBLEMS YOU HAVE CREATED.
It's quite funny.
2007-09-06 09:36:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
They are going to wag their finger and give the Iranians a good tongue lashing in English. Then they will blame GWB and claim Clinton had nothing to do with it. Oh yeah, then Hsu will be made chief foreign ambassador.
2007-09-06 09:20:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by ken 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Liberals are just funny to think that they can negotiate with Iran. Gosh.... I guess if we would have just sat down and talked with Bin Ladden we could have avoided 9/11.... nevermind their vow to kill all infidels... I'm sure if we just talk to them and try and understand them.... SERIOUSLY.... take the blinders off. Terrorists are NOT interested in negotiating. Their wacko extremist beliefs tell them to kill, kill, KILL all who do not believe as they do.
2007-09-06 09:56:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mr. Perfect 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Michael Moore's movies
2007-09-06 09:19:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by de viking 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
They aren't planning on doing a damn thing. Liberals never try to defend our country because according to them we are the root of all evil in the world.
2007-09-06 09:20:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
They would probably vote for it before they voted against it.
OR
They would go with the popular opinion to get the votes... I choose whatever you choose!
2007-09-06 09:29:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋