We'll have to wait and see.
2007-09-06 00:28:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by True Blue Brit 7
·
7⤊
3⤋
it tell,s you that the easy way out is to blame the parents because the police are so bloody useless its a way of making life easy for them i don't think that the parents have anything to do with that child missing even if Ive no time for them for neglecting her i really don't think they have done anything to harm her if they had there first escape would be to get out of that country so you should not say that they are guilty as the police have no real evidence and neither have you so stop making bad matters worse because you shouldn't say that man will be going to prison as he is Innocent until proved other wise
2007-09-08 15:53:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What does it tell me? Well for me it tells me that you really need to get out more! And let things take their course.
Que sera sera!
Edit:
Grumbles when someone (a child) is missing does this mean that they could not have been abucted.....what point am I missing here?
And Mr Bigs you expressed my feelings as well.
Enough!
2007-09-06 08:46:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Boudicca 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
It tells me that the PJ might actually be doing their job properly for once.
All witnesses should be interviewed seperately from day one.
2007-09-06 07:35:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Mr. Bigs....I personally (and I doubt anyone else here) supports paedos...please note that she DISAPPEARED, meaning it is only a possibility(a slim one at that) that she was abducted. Next time you are about to write a comment, sit down to think about it first!
2007-09-06 08:11:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
yes exactly, if they are not suspect then why the police doen't see the 2 of them together to give them the results? or may be they plan to scare them by saying to Gerry , Kate has told us everything (when she hasn't) then he feels trapped and say it all.
2007-09-06 07:29:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Goldfish" 1
·
3⤊
3⤋
They are being interviewed as witnesses not suspects ~ but they shouldn't have left those beautiful babies on their own - enough said.
2007-09-06 07:29:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
13⤊
0⤋
Gerry who?
2007-09-06 07:32:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by my brain hurts 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
I'm sure he will demand a private wing!
2007-09-06 08:34:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
LMAO!!!!!!! The Question title cracked me up!!!! i can see him now... in his celll.... writing his blog. LMAO. Gerry is a fool!!!
x
2007-09-06 07:58:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
only time will tell.
2007-09-06 08:27:29
·
answer #11
·
answered by daisy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋