menopause induced dementia
2007-09-06 02:06:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by froghugger 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
great answer some one gave till now..." Political stances have not something to do with it, professors." So does that recommend i'm can leap strait into being a CEO of any employer, purely because of the fact i decide for to? What an ignorant reaction.. besides, based on the question handy. Politically, Obama and Hillary are the two decrease than qualified. Edwards, and everybody else on the point for that count, have greater exp. than Obama and Hillary blended. although, in immediately's cutting-element circumstances, a president isn't chosen based upon how qualified they're, extremely that's a acceptance contest. those that vote for Hillary will gain this because of the fact she's lady. those that vote for Obama will gain this because of the fact he's black. And, besides, Jimmy Carter replaced into an staggering Governor, terrible president. Carter had a similar experience backing him as bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and greater than a number of different different presidents. maximum all of the U.S. Presidents got here into place of work after being a State Governor, seeing as the way it is basically a similar place on a plenty smaller scale.
2016-11-14 08:03:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I love it that some people believe you should turn your back on the low morality of the Clintons. How Liberal can you get? No, she hasn't learned a thing. She is big and brassy with the ego to match.
Fred in '08
2007-09-06 00:54:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Moody Red 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
With Hillary, its not about thinking, it's about dreaming. Ever since she joined NOW, she has wanted to be the first woman elected President of the USA. Heaven help us if she ever gets there. Not that she can't think, but that she applies her thoughts to getting elected and furthering her personal agenda(s), not what's good for everyone, but what's good for Hillary.
2007-09-06 01:03:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by SteveA8 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
the talent to pull one over on the american public for approx eight years and have a hair over fifty percent of the american electorate give her a pass....why constantly baffles me..the idea she wasnt involved or somehow..."didnt know" is pure unadulterated caa caa.
2007-09-05 23:26:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Wimpering about other candidates while Chimpy McFlightsuit crashes America into the ground is a feeble pretext indeed.
2007-09-05 21:26:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by cons_are_cowards 2
·
5⤊
4⤋
She's delusional, and her supporters are 10 times more so.
2007-09-05 23:58:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by hottiecj *~♥~*~♥~* 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
As a second term senator, she's more qualified than George W. Bush was when he got into office. She was also a very successful attorney before becoming First Lady, while GWB had a long history of driving businesses into the ground. I don't support Clinton, but I have no doubt that she's qualified enough to do the job.
2007-09-05 21:39:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
8⤋
An ego bigger than a house.
2007-09-05 21:11:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by tom p 3
·
6⤊
3⤋
..."that Clinton woman"...? are you talking about the socialist, "wench" wife of former President "drop-his-pants" who was impeached on December 18th 1998 ?... The carpetbagger Senator from NY who know about as much about NY as "Pee Wee Herman" knows about electricity? or are you talking about Monica Lewinsky (that "Clinton" woman)...?
2007-09-05 21:41:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
6⤋