LOL. Bush does not appease terrorists?
I suppose you must be blind to the fact that the Bush adminstration has been all too cozy with the Saudi royal family which has been known to funnel US money and arms to Wahhabist militants who've been known to associate with al-Qaeda terrorists.
As for the state of Israel, just look how its hawkish policy "worked wonders" for them in stopping terrorism. Hah!
Cut the looming threat at its root source and terrorist entities would be dealt a serious blow rather than taking them all head-on with a failing reactionary brute-force offfensive.
2007-09-06 01:39:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
President Bush didn't "take the field." He's a draft dodger, remember? Bush did the right thing by invading Afghanistan, but then he screwed it up like the spoiled rich wastoid he is by invading Iraq. Iraq, for those who keep forgetting, had nothing to do with Al Qaeda. While Bush may not have been an appeaser, he did nothing to make us safer. He put us in more danger.
The modern world requires serious people with real solutions to complex problems. Not every issue can be resolved with a hammer. You can dismiss this by labeling people "appeasers," but you're not helping us.
2007-09-05 21:07:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No matter what people feel about Iraq and Bush...we will never allow a President to appease Islamo-fascists ever again.
2007-09-06 04:19:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by bruiserkc2 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well if the next President is a Democrat, yes he or she will appease them. They will get Michigan and transform it into an Islamic State.
I dont think much of Obama, besides he is too green behind the ears. HIllary terrifies the heck out of me. People do not realize that Democrats want to turn the US into the EU and play on the poor and minorities of our country.
Democrats (socialist) will make slaves of us all...
Do you honestly think that Democrats will stand up to Terrorist? They were afraid to go on Foxnews, to face serious questions, for a debate. What makes you think they can stand up to the bad guys. Again, thats why they will give them Michigan..
I mean come on folks, what more do you need to realize that this group of Democrats running for President are weak on foreign policy???
2007-09-05 21:29:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Baghdad Pete ! 4
·
1⤊
5⤋
i admire those like the single above me. (DeusXmachina)war isn't the respond. And the respond is????.......... the different shoe not at all drops...... i will provide help to be attentive to what the respond is.... consistent vigilance. A united us of a with eyes huge open. not blinking while it includes increasing the protection tension. not crying approximately listening into the conversations of criminals. not whining approximately creature comforts in a penal complex that holds people who have been keen to take out homes and die interior the technique. unlikely previously the cameras of the international to declare the president is irrational sooner or later and announcing you may paintings with him the subsequent.(Nancy Pelosi) not complaining with reference to the inconvenience and fee of secure practices not annoying capitulation. unlikely on your enemies hat in hand. not cavorting with a pocket dictator who insults your existence. not paying for the UN who says "the american heartland is basically too dumb to comprehend foreign places affairs" (Malloch Brown) And cheers and laughs while a turd like Chavez insults you. not yell while the US sells weapons to our source of capability mutually as Putin does the comparable around the corner. not desire you have been in a socialist us of a like France or Canada once you be attentive to you may desire to not cope with it. not balk at communicate of securing our borders. not gridlock the communication with political correctness. not make wild fake allegations with reference to the only people who paintings to maintain you alive. not cry foul while somebody shows you pass to paintings and pay your taxes. not blame all your misfortunes on the government. not chuckle at somebody who flies the flag. not condemn people who stick their necks out with an concept once you have none of your very own. If individuals united, a minimum of in spirit, we does not could desire to drop bombs. no you will dare supply us a reason.
2016-10-18 02:48:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Democrats will undoubtedly take a very soft position on terrorists and Islamic as*holes.
2007-09-05 21:20:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
They better face the American terrorists.
2007-09-05 23:10:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Uthman A 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary and Obama are highly unqualified. The Clinton regime already crippled the military duriing its first 8 years of hell, and Obama is a joke.
2007-09-05 21:05:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
if a Democrat wins they will surely appease them because it works look at Neville Chamberlain he appeased Hitler to which he said peace in our times it happened to cause world war 2 but that's a technicality vote for a Democrat any Democrat
2007-09-05 21:34:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Doctor 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
US Voters will never vote an appeaser President.
2007-09-05 21:03:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Keith 6
·
1⤊
4⤋