Cant we say now that the iraq war was worse than the 911 attacks themselves.
they cost more money, took more life, and has lowered our morale.
2007-09-05 16:55:28 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Gosh and think of what it did to the innocent Iraqi people too! Imagine their morale. Imagine their lost lives.
And all based on a lie!
But remember. This is a war on the Muslim world. It is also a war on the American people.
GET OUT AND HIT THE STREETS ON SEPTEMBER 11. PEACEFUL PROTEST BUT MAKE YOURSELF HEARD. IF YOU DON'T DO SOMETHING FAST YOU COULD BE A DICATORSHIP BEFORE ANOTHER YEAR PASSES.
2007-09-05 21:24:55 · answer #1 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully the presidency will lose some power to congress after this catastrophe. No one could have ever anticipated this level of arrogance and selfishness with an even greater level of incompetence. Bush needed almost no evidence for a preemptive attack, yet needs endless information to do something worthwhile about global warming. It's just unbelievable.
No it wasn't worth it. And the "Hind site is 20-20" defense is ludicrous. We have 1000s and 1000s of nuclear bombs. All nations know a nuclear attack on this country would result in hundreds in return, so there was no real worry that we would be attacked. We need to get out Today.
2007-09-05 17:12:32 · answer #2 · answered by Lisa 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who said Iraq had anything to do with 9/11? Read U.N. resolution 1441, there is no mention of 9/11. It was about Iraq's failure to adhere to its terms of surrender after the Kuwait invasion.
2007-09-05 17:00:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it somewhat is your perspective and a ludicrous wall of words, besides. If human beings did not fee the lives of others, we does not be over there. Saddam grew to become a situation for the U. S. and our allies, to not point out his very own genocide against his very own human beings. He had to flow. whilst he replaced into taken out, a void replaced into created. Iran and Syria froth on the mouth to get administration of Iraq. Do you compromise so a procedures? i think of what is going on is that human beings are having to come back to words with the certainty we are able to be in Iraq for an fairly long term, with the intention to maintain the peace and furnish long-term stability. we don't all like it, yet I do think of it is how that's. so a procedures as Afghanistan is going, Obama stated in his debate we've been "going to search out bin weighted down." Mmmm hmmmm.
2016-11-14 07:49:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, since Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 as it turns out...
2007-09-05 16:58:06 · answer #5 · answered by c'estmoi 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
And Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11.
What a travesty.
2007-09-05 17:07:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
911 and Iraq have nothing to do with each other. The responsible parties for 911 have still not been brought to justice......................
2007-09-05 17:00:14 · answer #7 · answered by Solo 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 so what's your point........
2007-09-05 16:58:45 · answer #8 · answered by Brian 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Was it worth it when we lost more lives in ww2 than at Pearl Harbor? And my morale is pretty good since we decided to fight back instead of shoving our heads in the sand and hoping the problem would just go away.
2007-09-05 17:00:07 · answer #9 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Funny, isn't it? Our "retaliations" always cost more in human life than the original "atrocities". Shows what a peaceful, moral nation we are....ahem....
2007-09-05 16:59:55 · answer #10 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋