Have no opinion, I'm English, we have problems of our own, just curious! And the lack of punctuation is deliberate - that question could be misunderstood.
2007-09-05 16:41:20 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
he would of thought they were punks
2007-09-05 16:44:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I do not know .A friend said " The GREAT of the century ; so up that people cannot get them and to get them will need perhaps a century more.Those who know the study at human behavior can tell you so but they a handful in this world and if ever that talk they may not have the audience-none will understand their messages! And if any wants to sponsor such a talk it would cost much at finance and days and days to explain all this!But once they attend such a "seminar" they come out as winners and new men of the world where they
can tread without any fear and chests up !Not only Americansand allies but all!
2007-09-05 23:58:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would be more ashamed of the citizens of United States for not paying attention and not doing anything about this family and all that they have done. He gave us, the people, the tools and the protection and nobody seems to care. The fact that we would let our civil liberties become eroded slowly over time and not revolt would disappoint him terribly.
2007-09-09 22:48:04 · answer #3 · answered by sanityinga 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One of the characteristics of George Washington that made him such a fine leader, both as President and as General, was his ability to keep his opinions about other people to himself.
Were George Washington alive today, we still wouldn't have an answer to your question.
2007-09-05 23:49:03 · answer #4 · answered by open4one 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If G. Washington had known that wannabe monarchists like the Bushes would eventually seize power in America, he probably would not have bothered with fighting the revolutionary war.
2007-09-05 23:53:57 · answer #5 · answered by cons_are_cowards 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He would've respected the elder Bush.
He would've thought of the younger Bush as most americans do now: an incompetent, imbecilic fool.
2007-09-06 06:34:09 · answer #6 · answered by Negligence 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Washington would have shunned GW and thought him a common little man
2007-09-07 07:37:57 · answer #7 · answered by georgieporgie2005uk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably would be very saddened at what "his" new nation has become in general, and outraged at the general stupidity in the administrations. (and among the voting public--and those who choose not to vote!)
2007-09-05 23:57:47 · answer #8 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Does the phrase "Turning in his grave" ring any bells?
2007-09-06 04:41:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He'd probably buy them a beer.
2007-09-06 00:00:39 · answer #10 · answered by .. 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
same as he thought of blairs hair....limp and oily
2007-09-05 23:47:24 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋