English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Israel is religious the Hebrew vs Muslim thing. The Us and Britain b/c we are supporters of Israel.

2007-09-05 16:53:14 · answer #1 · answered by renee70466 6 · 0 0

Britian at one time ruled most of the holy sites of Islam, Britian was intensely involved in the crusades and the setting up of puppet governments that sold cheap oil to their empire in the Islamic world. The time Britian spent in the middle east is huge. Modern time roughly WWI to 60's. They also signed a poorly worded, and largely anti muslim charter in the Balfour decleration that made Israel. The British had signed a white paper agreement saying a Jewish state would not appear in the middle east but the Balfour Decleration written around the same time said differently. Also Israel expanded under illegal immigration policies largely overlooked by the U.S and Britian because the U.S and Britian were largely anti-semetically run around WWII. However, that did not stop the U.S with unequally arming the Israelis, and politically supporting them in the UN charter that recognized the Jewish state in 1948, they held a vote when they knew that the soviets who would oppose this state because of their interests in Egypt, and other middle eastern states would not be in the UN site to vote thus getting an abstension from the soviets. Israel continued growing almost imperially, with help from the U.S. Israel could not exist without the major funding that came from Golda Meirs tour of the U.S. This causes great resentment and anger towards these places because many of the radical Islamic Jihadists grandparents and parents were directly affected by these political moves. Also you will note France is targeted because of Its long occupation in the area as well.

2007-09-05 16:55:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hatred of Israel and the Jews goes way back, so you cannot connect the US and Britain in the same way with Israel, the US support of Israel is one reason, Britain's presence over many years past is another, our need for their oil and control of what they do with the riches that come from it is another, their leaders religious or otherwise who stir up so much hatred to the west among the masses who see our presence in the region as a bad thing and do not like the idea of democracy which would bring about freedom of thought and speech to question their divine superiority.

We are in some ways messing with a world that does not want change or the life we lead, for sure most do want western technology and help in training their people to do it for themselves, Saudi Arabia is one example of that who clearly have the insight to realize that their oil won't last forever, but that is where it stops, they don't want to live like Westerners, they don't care about Westerners, and the more we interfere the more hate they us for it.

2007-09-05 17:44:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What your suggesting is as radical by way of fact the evaluations your attempting to eliminate, I do in a brilliant section agree that the open door coverage for immigration has made the activity ,industry a confusing place for an unskilled worker ( I talk from own adventure ) that subject will genuinely be exaggerated by way of the present monetary issues our united states of america is dealing with. the advantages for migrant workers are falling with the linked fee of the pound, better than one distant places worker has expressed this view to me. yet I infrequently factor we are close to to a mass exodus. your different question will boost some very confusing factors, the main important of it fairly is the place do you draw the line? I recommend do you lock up each and all the SNP? Or all people who speaks ill of the queen? Then there is the super question of climate sending the subject away will actually remedy something. I do although completely agree that the income gadget is lots to open to fraud and could be reviewed and that funds could be plied immediately into the police stress.

2016-10-19 22:40:22 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The answer is simple.

They're not.

Looking at the number of civilian deaths from terrorism in the past year, I think it's fairly obvious that Iraq is their number one target.

You can interpret that fact to mean whatever you want to, but you can only conclude that either their main targets are Iraqi civilians, or they are thoroughly incompetent.

2007-09-05 16:45:31 · answer #5 · answered by open4one 7 · 0 0

We be the infidels. hey, Open, they are in Iraq because the US and the Brits are there. According to their own proaganda that is their primary front against us.

2007-09-05 16:45:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They aren't.

There are far more terrorist attacks inside middle eastern nations, than there are terrorist attacks outside of the mideast.

2007-09-05 16:59:35 · answer #7 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1 0

Because we are the least like them, and we're hard to ignore.

2007-09-05 16:46:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because these three can all beat the hell out of them.

2007-09-05 16:47:26 · answer #9 · answered by doctdon 7 · 0 0

What about Spain and Bali..

2007-09-05 16:47:20 · answer #10 · answered by molly 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers