I tried to defend myself against a Temporary Restraining Order (TOR) and did not do a very good job in getting my side of the events before the judge, forgot to ask a few questions of the witness that would have brought some details to light and failed to sum up my position at the end of the hearing. Needless to say I am not an Attorney and did not know what I was doing or what to expect. Now that I have a TOR filed against me for the next 3 years is it possible to hire an attorney and challenge the original ruling against me?
2007-09-05
15:54:41
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Stater
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Here is the what and why of this question:
I am dealing with an angry girl who is using the legal system and her friends to get back at me in what ever way she can. This nut job has now filed a Restraining Order and I have no desire to go near her yet I fear that if I do not try to stop the Restraining Order it will come back to haunt me when a potential employer does a pre-employment background check.
2007-09-05
16:17:00 ·
update #1
Let me state that not having a TOR or getting a TOR overturned does not enable you to associate with a person.
I have no need or reason to go around miss crazy nut job I just don’t want this in my record.
I do know that fighting a TOR is a uphill battle and most judges will error on the side of caution.
If I had any way to cover the cost of a lawyer I would have, I did go to Legal Aid but the help I got there was useless with out a lawyer to execute the actions in court.
My advice to anyone going to court for any reason "get a Lawyer because you are not only paying for their legal knowledge but their familiarity with the process" and "Leagal Aid is useless when you are on your own and your challenger shows up with a lawyer".
2007-09-05
16:32:48 ·
update #2