English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...production and therefore increasing our nation's average absolute standard of living. Support your recommendation."

2007-09-05 15:26:55 · 4 answers · asked by taywill77 1 in Politics & Government Government

4 answers

This is a very interesting and good question....



I fell that a semi-socialized policy concentrating on family health care and automatic insurance coverage for workers would go a long way in boosting the productivity of industry and the work force overall. Others may say raising to a "decent" wage would do it, but if the workers did not have to worry about family medical or life insurance they would be better able to focus on the task at hand. The old school of "taking care of your people" should be the hall mark of the American legislation. In doing so the workers will improve production, profits will rise, wages will rise accordingly and the circle would continue. Socialized systems work for many countries, why not us? Because the American way is based on a profit/loss statement. The betterment of your community usually has a "What's in it for me?" catch to it. A specific government policy directed toward sharing the cost of health care with a set price for services and fees universally directed to cover the entire nation would be ground breaking in itself. But to couple that with a universal health and life insurance plan for workers in order to stablize the soaring cost of health care in this country, will shake the foundations. Good or bad. Those who are disabled or "unable" to care for themselves would still be allowed access to Social Security and other opportunities. The best way would be to find a job, get on the plan and stay put. The government would have to instigate new policies to assist business and industry in making more jobs.

Dr. Tommy Skelton

2007-09-05 16:04:33 · answer #1 · answered by tskelton155 5 · 0 0

Dr. Skelton sounds like a socialist to me. Any relation to Red? The best policy would be to get rid of all the socialist B.S. we already have and get back to the principals of the U.S. Constitution. All this regulation costs a lot of time and money that detracts from and adds nothing to production. We already have trillions of dollars of obligations to socialist schemes that are nothing but an anchor on the economy. If we got rid of the unconstitutional IRS and got back to Congress coining the money instead of farming it out to some illegal private corporation like we have now there would be a huge increase in our absolute standard of living.

2007-09-05 18:25:29 · answer #2 · answered by rick b 3 · 0 0

2 issues i come across extremely irksome: a million. The observe on our debt incurred by way of giving the wealthiest 5% a tax decrease is now owned by ability of the chinese language. while they call it in, we are screwed. 2. The mere concept of granting a tax decrease mutually as American infantrymen and their households are being asked to sacrifice is basically vile. while we've been united and had international-huge help, Bush advised us to pass procuring. I now not know my (former) occasion. We was once the occasion of economic accountability. Now we've bought our souls to the non secular top and the corporate gadget. Being somewhat accountable ability often times recognizing the could desire to strengthen sales. (Btw, Clinton ran us interior the black, left Bush a surplus and easily shrank the dimensions of gov't. those are concepts that the Republicans now basically pay lip-provider to. Clinton DID it.)

2016-10-18 02:21:03 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Bring back manufacturing to this country.

Get out of "NAFTA".

2007-09-05 16:13:03 · answer #4 · answered by tom p 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers